BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport vs Hankook Kinergy PT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1 + 2 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy PT
Tire BHankook

Kinergy PT

All Season Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 2 reviews (needs 5)

Not enough data yet to score these two side by side

We need test results or owner reviews in at least one shared category for both tires. What we know about each is on its own page.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advantage T/A Sport

Pros

  • Strong cornering grip and stability
  • Responsive steering feedback
  • Comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise
  • Vague on-center steering feel
All owner themes in the Advantage T/A Sport review

Tire B Kinergy PT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport B · Hankook Kinergy PT
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG600 - 660 A A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport

Hankook Kinergy PT

Neither tire has enough test or review data for a Relative Score yet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy PT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology