Tests – · none yet Owners – · 4 reviews (needs 5)
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Hankook Ventus V2 Concept — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison63Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ventus V2 Concept Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online – 60 Ventus V2 Concept: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63
No road tests of dry for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
–
Wet
No comparison65Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ventus V2 Concept Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 62 Ventus V2 Concept: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 65
No road tests of wet for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison45Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ventus V2 Concept Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online – 30 Ventus V2 Concept: 60% × 55.5 (est.) + 40% × 29.9 = 45
No road tests of snow for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
–
Comfort
No comparison61Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ventus V2 Concept Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 57 Ventus V2 Concept: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 57.4 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison61Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ventus V2 Concept Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online – 57 Ventus V2 Concept: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison60Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ventus V2 Concept Reviews found online – 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Hankook Ventus V2 Concept |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 60 |
| Dry | – | 63 |
| Wet | – | 65 |
| Snow | – | 45 |
| Comfort | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | – | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Advantage T/A
60
/ 100
Ventus V2 Concept
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advantage T/A
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Tire B Ventus V2 Concept
Pros
- Excellent handling and cornering performance on dry surfaces
- High value for money and affordability for budget-conscious buyers
- Impressive tread life and longevity, with some users reporting up to 70,000 km of use
Cons
- Becomes significantly noisy as the tire ages and wears
- Poor grip in snow and ice conditions
- Durability issues including sidewall wear and vulnerability to curb damage
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Hankook Ventus V2 Concept |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
60
/ 100
Hankook Ventus V2 Concept
Only Hankook Ventus V2 Concept has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V2 Concept
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology