Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position vs Bridgestone Turanza T001 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 2 + 2,187 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Turanza T001

Turanza T001

Summer

± 8

Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 57 · 2,187 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Bridgestone turanza t001 do I need to replace them with these small cracks ? It’s 4 year old since production and is it dangerous to travel alot with these small cracks?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole PositionTuranza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–69
    Reviews found online–61

    Turanza T001: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 60.7 = 66

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole PositionTuranza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–76
    Reviews found online–63

    Turanza T001: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 63.4 = 71

  3. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole PositionTuranza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–59

    Turanza T001: 40% × 67.2 (est.) + 60% × 58.7 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Turanza T001. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole PositionTuranza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online–48

    Turanza T001: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza T001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  5. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole PositionTuranza T001
    Reviews found online–58
  6. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole PositionTuranza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–62
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position vs Bridgestone Turanza T001: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole PositionBridgestone Turanza T001
Relative Score – 65
Dry – 66
Wet – 71
Comfort – 62
Treadwear – 55
Handling (owners) – 58
Efficiency – 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE050A Pole Position

± 8

Turanza T001

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE050A Pole Position

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Turanza T001

Pros

  • Good dry grip and stable highway handling
  • Comfortable ride quality with low road noise on many surfaces
  • Solid steering feedback and direct road feel

Cons

  • Accelerated and uneven tread wear, particularly on front or drive wheels
  • Inconsistent or poor wet grip, with several users reporting aquaplaning risks
  • Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh or firm ride over uneven surfaces
All owner themes in the Turanza T001 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Bridgestone Turanza T001

Neutral

Community discussions around the Bridgestone Turanza T001 largely center on replacement decisions, tire longevity, and tread aging. Users note that the tire provides a good balance of comfort, durability, and low road noise compared to sportier alternatives, though owners frequently question surface cracking after four years of use.

Top themes
#tread wear and longevity#surface cracking concerns#ride comfort and noise#tire replacement options#comparisons with performance tires

Based on 8 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position B · Bridgestone Turanza T001
CategorySummer Max Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—37
Rim diameters—15″ – 19″
Sidewall—Blackwall

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position

Bridgestone Turanza T001

Only Bridgestone Turanza T001 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position
Tire B · Bridgestone Turanza T001

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology