Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 7 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza s03 vs Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, 71–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 40 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1074Why this score
Source Potenza s03 ContiMaxContact MC6 Reviews found online 62 77 -
56
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1672Why this score
Source Potenza s03 ContiMaxContact MC6 Reviews found online 51 73 -
60
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1070Why this score
Source Potenza s03 ContiMaxContact MC6 Reviews found online 51 70 -
61
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC6 +465Why this score
Source Potenza s03 ContiMaxContact MC6 Reviews found online 58 64 -
56
Handling
ContiMaxContact MC6 +2076Why this score
Source Potenza s03 ContiMaxContact MC6 Reviews found online 56 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza s03 | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 71 |
| Dry | 64 | 74 |
| Wet | 56 | 72 |
| Comfort | 60 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 65 |
| Handling | 56 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza s03
ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza s03
Pros
- Exceptional dry weather grip and handling precision
- Stiff sidewall construction provides excellent road feel and cornering stability
- Reliable braking performance in dry conditions
Cons
- Inconsistent traction and tendency to spin on wet or damp surfaces
- Harsh or 'crashy' ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
- Pronounced tram-lining issues on uneven road surfaces
Tire B ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza s03 | B · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 3 |
| Rim diameters | — | 19″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza s03
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 76 vs 56 on handling.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 72 vs 56 on wet.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 64 on dry.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 70 vs 60 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.