Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 12 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT vs Michelin Pilot Sport 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 3 is ahead, 67–55
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
Pilot Sport 3 +1668Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Pilot Sport 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 44 68 Turanza ER300 RFT: 60% × 58.1 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 52
Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.1 = 68
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
57
Wet
Pilot Sport 3 +1370Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Pilot Sport 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 51 70 Turanza ER300 RFT: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57
Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 70
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
54
Comfort
Pilot Sport 3 +862Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Pilot Sport 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 47 59 Turanza ER300 RFT: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 47.2 = 54
Pilot Sport 3: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 58.8 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
57
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 3 +360Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Pilot Sport 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 51 56 Turanza ER300 RFT: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57
Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
51
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Pilot Sport 3 Reviews found online 51 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT | Michelin Pilot Sport 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 67 |
| Dry | 52 | 68 |
| Wet | 57 | 70 |
| Comfort | 54 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
55
/ 100
Turanza ER300 RFT
67
/ 100
Pilot Sport 3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300 RFT
Pros
- Decent dry grip and acceptable comfort for a run-flat tire
- Impressive tread life and mileage reported by highway and long-distance drivers
- Reliable OEM fitment integration for compatible vehicles like BMW models
Cons
- Subpar or near-zero grip in wet conditions, frequently causing traction control activation
- Harsh and noisy ride quality typical of the run-flat construction
- Rapid tread wear reported by some drivers on mixed roads
Tire B Pilot Sport 3
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 10 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
| UTQG | — | 320 AA A |
Which one should you actually buy?
55
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT
67
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport 3
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 3 — better dry, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Pilot Sport 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 68 vs 52 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 70 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 62 vs 54 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 60 vs 57 on treadwear.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 3
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza ER300 RFT or Pilot Sport 3?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 RFT or Pilot Sport 3?
Michelin Pilot Sport 3, 70 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 RFT or Pilot Sport 3?
Michelin Pilot Sport 3, 68 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 RFT or Pilot Sport 3?
Michelin Pilot Sport 3, 62 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 RFT or Pilot Sport 3?
Michelin Pilot Sport 3, 60 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology