Hankook OPTIMO H724 AS looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn G FIT AS vs Hankook OPTIMO H724 AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 1 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn G FIT AS
Tire ALaufenn

G FIT AS

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 14 reviews

Hankook OPTIMO H724 AS
Tire BHankook

OPTIMO H724 AS

All Season Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG FIT ASOPTIMO H724 AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online57–

    G FIT AS: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 61

    No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 59

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG FIT ASOPTIMO H724 AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    G FIT AS: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 59

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG FIT ASOPTIMO H724 AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online51–

    G FIT AS: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 59

    No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG FIT ASOPTIMO H724 AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online59–

    G FIT AS: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59.2 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for G FIT AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 55

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG FIT ASOPTIMO H724 AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)–
    Reviews found online47–

    G FIT AS: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 59

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG FIT ASOPTIMO H724 AS
    Reviews found online59–
Scores at a glance
Laufenn G FIT AS vs Hankook OPTIMO H724 AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn G FIT ASHankook OPTIMO H724 AS
Relative Score 59 –
Dry 61 –
Wet 59 –
Snow 59 –
Comfort 62 –
Treadwear 55 –
Handling (owners) 59 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

G FIT AS

OPTIMO H724 AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A G FIT AS

Pros

  • Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Decent dry pavement grip and handling

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
  • Inadequate winter and snow performance
  • Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
All owner themes in the G FIT AS review

Tire B OPTIMO H724 AS

Pros

  • Predictable breakaway characteristics at the limit
  • Environmentally conscious design

Cons

  • Poor dry surface traction
  • Hard compound negatively impacts handling
  • Prone to oversteer during cornering
All owner themes in the OPTIMO H724 AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn G FIT AS B · Hankook OPTIMO H724 AS
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn G FIT AS

Hankook OPTIMO H724 AS

Only Laufenn G FIT AS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Laufenn G FIT AS
Tire B · Hankook OPTIMO H724 AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology