Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 vs Nitto NT555 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 0 road tests and 23 + 13 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport Cup 2 is ahead, 67–53

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
± 6

Tests 66 · 6 tests Owners 65 · 23 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test (dry braking)

Nitto NT555
Tire BNitto

NT555

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 13 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 83

    Dry

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 +28
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests84≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online8248

    Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 84.1 + 40% × 81.9 = 83

    NT555: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 55

    No road tests of dry for NT555. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 55

    Wet

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 +3
    52
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests52≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online6045

    Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 51.6 + 40% × 60.2 = 55

    NT555: 60% × 56.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.9 = 52

    No road tests of wet for NT555. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    41
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online–23

    NT555: 60% × 53.1 (est.) + 40% × 23.4 = 41

    No road tests of snow for NT555. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 +7
    52
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests49≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6644

    Pilot Sport Cup 2: 40% × 48.5 + 60% × 65.7 = 59

    NT555: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 44 = 52

    No road tests of comfort for NT555. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 +9
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests71≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)50

    Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 71 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69

    NT555: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 60

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport Cup 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for NT555. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 +4
    52
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online5043

    Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 56

    NT555: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 43.4 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for NT555. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 +30
    50
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2NT555
    Reviews found online8050
  8. 59

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests59–
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 vs Nitto NT555: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2Nitto NT555
Relative Score 67 53
Dry 83 55
Wet 55 52
Snow – 41
Comfort 59 52
Noise 69 60
Treadwear 56 52
Handling (owners) 80 50
Efficiency 59 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Pilot Sport Cup 2

± 8

NT555

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport Cup 2

Pros

  • Phenomenal grip and stability in dry conditions
  • Exceptional steering precision and driver feedback
  • Strong, robust sidewalls providing great agility and balance

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • High purchase price
  • Requires significant heat to achieve optimal grip, making them less ideal for cold or short road trips
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport Cup 2 review

Tire B NT555

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and sticky, hot-tar-like road adhesion
  • Enhanced handling and high-speed stability
  • Sporty aesthetic and semi-slick feel favored by enthusiasts

Cons

  • Subpar wet weather traction and dangerous in winter/cold conditions
  • Can struggle to maintain traction on higher-horsepower vehicles (e.g., V8 setups)
  • Notable road noise that increases as the tire wears
All owner themes in the NT555 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 B · Nitto NT555
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1853
Rim diameters18″ – 21″15″ – 22″
Tread depth—10.3/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2

Nitto NT555

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 — better handling, dry and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nitto NT555 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 scores 80 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 scores 83 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 scores 69 vs 60 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 scores 59 vs 52 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
Tire B · Nitto NT555

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport Cup 2 or NT555?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport Cup 2 or NT555?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2, 55 vs 52 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport Cup 2 or NT555?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2, 83 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport Cup 2 or NT555?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2, 69 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport Cup 2 or NT555?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2, 59 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport Cup 2 or NT555?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2, 56 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology