Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 5 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Advanta HPZ-02 vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 5 + 165 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: HPZ-02 and N Fera SU1 are level at 63.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 62 · 165 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
HPZ-02 +558Why this score
Source HPZ-02 N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 55 Reviews found online 61 64 HPZ-02: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63
N Fera SU1: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 63.7 = 58
No road tests of dry for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
67
Wet
HPZ-02 +364Why this score
Source HPZ-02 N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 66 67 HPZ-02: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 67
N Fera SU1: 60% × 62.2 + 40% × 67 = 64
No road tests of wet for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Snow
HPZ-02 +158Why this score
Source HPZ-02 N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 51 49 HPZ-02: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 59
N Fera SU1: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 58
No road tests of snow for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
N Fera SU1 +465Why this score
Source HPZ-02 N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 58 65 HPZ-02: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.7 = 61
N Fera SU1: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 64.9 = 65
No road tests of comfort for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Noise
N Fera SU1 +569Why this score
Source HPZ-02 N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 61 70 HPZ-02: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 64
N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 69.5 = 69
No road tests of noise for HPZ-02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
N Fera SU1 +366Why this score
Source HPZ-02 N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 61 60 HPZ-02: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63
N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.5 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
59
Handling (owners)
N Fera SU1 +766Why this score
Source HPZ-02 N Fera SU1 Reviews found online 59 66 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison76Why this score
Source HPZ-02 N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Advanta HPZ-02 | Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 63 |
| Dry | 63 | 58 |
| Wet | 67 | 64 |
| Snow | 59 | 58 |
| Comfort | 61 | 65 |
| Noise | 64 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 66 |
| Efficiency | – | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
HPZ-02
63
/ 100
N Fera SU1
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A HPZ-02
Pros
- Fabulous value and affordability for the price point
- Surprinsingly good dry and wet grip for a standard road tire
- Sharp handling and competent everyday performance
Cons
- Durability issues, specifically sidewall bubbling reported on low-profile sizes
- Potential vibration and structural integrity concerns under certain vehicle setups
Tire B N Fera SU1
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
- Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
- Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
- Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
- Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Advanta HPZ-02 | B · Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 97 | 97 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 24″ | 15″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 420 A A | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 55 | 55 |
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Advanta HPZ-02
63
/ 100
Nexen N Fera SU1
Too close to call: Advanta HPZ-02 and Nexen N Fera SU1 are within 2 points overall. Advanta HPZ-02 is stronger on dry and wet. Nexen N Fera SU1 is stronger on handling, noise and comfort. Advanta HPZ-02 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 59 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Advanta HPZ-02 scores 63 vs 58 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 69 vs 64 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 65 vs 61 on comfort.
Tire A · Advanta HPZ-02
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
HPZ-02 or N Fera SU1?
Which is better in the wet, HPZ-02 or N Fera SU1?
Advanta HPZ-02, 67 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, HPZ-02 or N Fera SU1?
Advanta HPZ-02, 63 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, HPZ-02 or N Fera SU1?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 58 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, HPZ-02 or N Fera SU1?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 69 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, HPZ-02 or N Fera SU1?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, HPZ-02 or N Fera SU1?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology