tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Atturo AW730 vs Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 20 road tests and 23 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

AW730 is ahead, 75–70

Check price on Amazon · AW730 or EUROWINTER HS02 Pro on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Atturo AW730
Tire AAtturo

AW730

Winter tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 23 reviews

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
Tire BFalken

EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

Winter

± 5

Tests 61 · 20 tests Owners 78 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test (ice handling (tester's mark))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    EUROWINTER HS02 Pro +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceAW730EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests≈ 70 (est.)74
    Reviews found online7381

    AW730: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    EUROWINTER HS02 Pro: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 80.8 = 77

    No road tests of dry for AW730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 79

    Wet

    EUROWINTER HS02 Pro +3
    82
    Why this score
    SourceAW730EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 77 (est.)81
    Reviews found online8283

    AW730: 60% × 76.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.9 = 79

    EUROWINTER HS02 Pro: 60% × 81.1 + 40% × 83.4 = 82

    No road tests of wet for AW730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 75

    Snow

    AW730 +12
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAW730EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests≈ 73 (est.)53
    Reviews found online7878

    AW730: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 75

    EUROWINTER HS02 Pro: 60% × 52.7 + 40% × 77.5 = 63

    No road tests of snow for AW730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    EUROWINTER HS02 Pro +5
    77
    Why this score
    SourceAW730EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 70 (est.)80
    Reviews found online7376

    AW730: 40% × 69.6 (est.) + 60% × 73.2 = 72

    EUROWINTER HS02 Pro: 40% × 79.6 + 60% × 75.8 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for AW730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 68

    Noise

    EUROWINTER HS02 Pro +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAW730EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 66 (est.)70
    Reviews found online69≈ 66 (est.)

    AW730: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 68

    EUROWINTER HS02 Pro: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69

    No road tests of noise for AW730. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROWINTER HS02 Pro. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 77

    Treadwear

    AW730 +33
    44
    Why this score
    SourceAW730EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 72 (est.)26
    Reviews found online8371

    AW730: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 82.8 = 77

    EUROWINTER HS02 Pro: 60% × 25.8 + 40% × 71.2 = 44

    No road tests of treadwear for AW730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    79
    Why this score
    SourceAW730EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    Reviews found online–79
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    48
    Why this score
    SourceAW730EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests–48
Scores at a glance
CategoryAtturo AW730Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
Relative Score 75 70
Dry 71 77
Wet 79 82
Snow 75 63
Comfort 72 77
Noise 68 69
Treadwear 77 44
Handling (owners) – 79
Efficiency – 48

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

AW730

± 5

EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AW730

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in deep snow and ice
  • Significantly more affordable than premium winter tire brands
  • Surprising quietness and smooth ride quality for a winter tire

Cons

  • Increased road noise at higher speeds for some users
  • Subpar cornering performance and handling on dry pavement
  • Aggressive tread pattern that takes some adjustment on dry roads
All owner themes in the AW730 review

Tire B EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • Strong dry road handling characteristics
  • Surprisingly capable performance in snow and cold conditions

Cons

  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
  • Concerns regarding long-term tread wear
  • Higher noise levels compared to dedicated summer tires
All owner themes in the EUROWINTER HS02 Pro review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Atturo AW730 B · Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
CategoryWinter tireWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available22109
Rim diameters17″ – 21″16″ – 22″
Tread depth11.3/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common2020

Which one should you actually buy?

Atturo AW730

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

Winner: Atturo AW730 — better treadwear and snow. Pick the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro if dry, comfort and wet matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Atturo AW730 scores 77 vs 44 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Atturo AW730 scores 75 vs 63 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro scores 77 vs 71 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro scores 77 vs 72 on comfort.

Tire A · Atturo AW730
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AW730 or EUROWINTER HS02 Pro?

Which is better in the wet, AW730 or EUROWINTER HS02 Pro?

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro, 82 vs 79 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, AW730 or EUROWINTER HS02 Pro?

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro, 77 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, AW730 or EUROWINTER HS02 Pro?

Atturo AW730, 75 vs 63 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, AW730 or EUROWINTER HS02 Pro?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, AW730 or EUROWINTER HS02 Pro?

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro, 77 vs 72 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, AW730 or EUROWINTER HS02 Pro?

Atturo AW730, 77 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology