Tests – · none yet Owners 87 · 15 reviews
Avon Spirit ST vs Avon Storm 3D XM — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 15 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Spirit ST is ahead, 82–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
82
Dry
Spirit ST +1765Why this score
Source Spirit ST Storm 3D XM Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 77 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 89 63 Spirit ST: 60% × 76.7 (est.) + 40% × 89.1 = 82
Storm 3D XM: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
No road tests of dry for Spirit ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Storm 3D XM. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
87
Wet
Spirit ST +2463Why this score
Source Spirit ST Storm 3D XM Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 83 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 93 60 Spirit ST: 60% × 83 (est.) + 40% × 93.1 = 87
Storm 3D XM: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
No road tests of wet for Spirit ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Storm 3D XM. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
Spirit ST +1464Why this score
Source Spirit ST Storm 3D XM Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 82 62 Spirit ST: 40% × 71.5 (est.) + 60% × 81.9 = 78
Storm 3D XM: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Spirit ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Storm 3D XM. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
75
Treadwear
Spirit ST +768Why this score
Source Spirit ST Storm 3D XM Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 80 68 Spirit ST: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 80.3 = 75
Storm 3D XM: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Spirit ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Storm 3D XM. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
87
Handling (owners)
Spirit ST +2859Why this score
Source Spirit ST Storm 3D XM Reviews found online 87 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon Spirit ST | Avon Storm 3D XM |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 64 |
| Dry | 82 | 65 |
| Wet | 87 | 63 |
| Comfort | 78 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 87 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Spirit ST
Storm 3D XM
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Spirit ST
Pros
- Excellent grip in dry, cold and wet conditions, with confidence-inspiring braking and wet-weather performance, and capability extending to occasional track use
- Stable, predictable handling at high speeds and under heavy loads (pillion and luggage), with a comfortable ride and low noise
- Good tread life reported by several riders, who describe even wear, resistance to squaring off and mileage up to nearly double that of Michelin tyres
Cons
- Wear complaints from a minority, including one rider who got only about 2,000 km
- Reluctance to turn in fast direction changes and a lack of feedback from the tyres, according to one reviewer
- Front tyre vibration and shaking over 60 mph on one BMW K1600GT, which persisted after rebalancing at two garages
Tire B Storm 3D XM
Pros
- High mileage and tread longevity
- Strong dry-weather grip and stability
- Excellent value for money compared to premium alternatives
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and lack of confidence
- Vague front-end feedback and 'squirming' sensation
- Tendency to track road grooves and imperfections
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon Spirit ST | B · Avon Storm 3D XM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Avon Spirit ST
Avon Storm 3D XM
Winner: Avon Spirit ST — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Avon Spirit ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Avon Storm 3D XM rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Avon Spirit ST scores 87 vs 59 on handling.
Avon Spirit ST scores 87 vs 63 on wet.
Avon Spirit ST scores 82 vs 65 on dry.
Avon Spirit ST scores 78 vs 64 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Spirit ST or Storm 3D XM?
Which is better in the wet, Spirit ST or Storm 3D XM?
Avon Spirit ST, 87 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Spirit ST or Storm 3D XM?
Avon Spirit ST, 82 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Spirit ST or Storm 3D XM?
Avon Spirit ST, 78 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Spirit ST or Storm 3D XM?
Avon Spirit ST, 75 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology