Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 14 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Avon ZT7 vs Continental EcoContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 6 road tests and 14 + 3,281 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ZT7 56, EcoContact 6 57.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 43 · 3,281 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“For efficiency I would recommend continental ecocontact 6/7. I get around 11kw/100km in the city and 14-15kw/100km on the highway. Would recommend. RWD 19 inch wheels Not very good on a rainy road tho”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
EcoContact 6 +764Why this score
Source ZT7 EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 51 46 ZT7: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57
EcoContact 6: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 45.5 = 64
No road tests of dry for ZT7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
60
Wet
ZT7 +951Why this score
Source ZT7 EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 53 Reviews found online 55 47 ZT7: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60
EcoContact 6: 60% × 53.5 + 40% × 47.4 = 51
No road tests of wet for ZT7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Comfort
Level56Why this score
Source ZT7 EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 50 49 ZT7: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 49.6 = 56
EcoContact 6: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 49.4 = 56
No road tests of comfort for ZT7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for EcoContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison77Why this score
Source ZT7 EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 85 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) EcoContact 6: 60% × 84.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 77
No owner ratings of noise for EcoContact 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
49
Treadwear
EcoContact 6 +1261Why this score
Source ZT7 EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 38 33 ZT7: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.9 = 49
EcoContact 6: 60% × 79.2 + 40% × 33.1 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for ZT7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
49
Handling (owners)
ZT7 +445Why this score
Source ZT7 EcoContact 6 Reviews found online 49 45 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison100Why this score
Source ZT7 EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 100
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon ZT7 | Continental EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 57 |
| Dry | 57 | 64 |
| Wet | 60 | 51 |
| Comfort | 56 | 56 |
| Noise | – | 77 |
| Treadwear | 49 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 45 |
| Efficiency | – | 100 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
56
/ 100
ZT7
57
/ 100
EcoContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZT7
Pros
- High value for money compared to premium brands like Pirelli or Continental
- Impressively low noise levels and high ride comfort due to compliant sidewalls
- Good grip and predictable handling for daily commuting and normal driving conditions
Cons
- Tendency for premature sidewall cracking or perishing within 2 to 4 years
- Prone to progressive understeer or reduced grip when pushed hard in corners
- Inconsistent wet performance and aquaplaning susceptibility reported by some commercial users
Tire B EcoContact 6
Pros
- Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Good dry grip and stable handling under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, especially on drive wheels
- Subpar wet-weather grip and high susceptibility to aquaplaning
- Shallow initial tread depth out of the box (approx. 6.0-6.5mm)
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Avon ZT7
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Negative
Continental EcoContact 6
Community sentiment regarding the Continental Eco Contact 6 is overwhelmingly negative, with users frequently criticizing its poor wet weather grip, braking performance, and handling. While praised occasionally for low rolling resistance and energy efficiency, owners repeatedly report premature tread wear, cracking, and chunking or delamination under normal driving conditions.
r/BMW
·2 upvotes ·2025-05-18
“Used Continental EcoContact 6 I have recently bought a G31 from 2022 which came with winter tires. Therefor I have bought summer tires which are used and were advertised as 5,5mm profile depth on each tire. I have measured each tire and am wondering which tire should be installed on which side and if front or rear would be better. Unfortunately there is no mark to show on which position they were on the previous owners car. Starting from outside moving inside I have measured the following millimetres: Tire 1: 5.51, 5.69, 5.85, 5.36 Tire 2: 5.40, 5.58, 5.71, 5.33 Tire 3: 5.59, 5.69, 5.79, 5.39 Tire 4: 5.38, 5.55, 5.73, 5.34 Seeing the numbers I would go with tire 2 and 4 on one axis und 1 and 3 on the other. Would that be a good idea and where should each pair go, front or rear? Is this even important at this low difference? I am happy for any advise. Thanks. Read more”
r/KiaEV6
·1 upvote ·2026-07-27
“For efficiency I would recommend continental ecocontact 6/7. I get around 11kw/100km in the city and 14-15kw/100km on the highway. Would recommend. RWD 19 inch wheels Not very good on a rainy road tho”
r/CarTalkUK
·2025-05-31
“Continental tyres falling apart Thoughts on this? Continental EcoContact 6 on a Ford Focus hatch, covered 10k miles of mild to moderate driving and both fronts are covered in chunks like the photos. Can’t recall driving on any particular surface or road recently that would have caused such damage. Date stamp is 2423 so almost bang on two years old. Looks like delamination to me but I’m no expert. Anyone seen anything like this before? Read more”
Top themes
#poor wet grip#energy efficiency#premature wear#tread chunking#factory OE fitment#replacement alternatives
Based on 29 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon ZT7 | B · Continental EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 104 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 320 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
56
/ 100
Avon ZT7
57
/ 100
Continental EcoContact 6
Too close to call: Avon ZT7 and Continental EcoContact 6 are within 2 points overall. Avon ZT7 is stronger on wet. Continental EcoContact 6 is stronger on treadwear and dry. Avon ZT7 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental EcoContact 6 scores 61 vs 49 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Avon ZT7 scores 60 vs 51 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental EcoContact 6 scores 64 vs 57 on dry.
Tire A · Avon ZT7
Tire B · Continental EcoContact 6
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZT7 or EcoContact 6?
Which is better in the wet, ZT7 or EcoContact 6?
Avon ZT7, 60 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZT7 or EcoContact 6?
Continental EcoContact 6, 64 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ZT7 or EcoContact 6?
Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 56 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ZT7 or EcoContact 6?
Continental EcoContact 6, 61 vs 49 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology