Head-to-head Updated

Barum Polaris 6 vs Matador MP93 Nordicca — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 7 + 6 road tests and 6 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

Polaris 6 leads, 74–72 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Barum Polaris 6
Tire ABarum

Polaris 6

Winter

± 6

Tests 72 · 7 tests Owners 76 · 6 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (snow braking)

Matador MP93 Nordicca
Tire BMatador

MP93 Nordicca

Winter

± 6

Tests 70 · 6 tests Owners 74 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 31 in 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    MP93 Nordicca +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePolaris 6MP93 Nordicca
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests5361
    Reviews found online7575
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–190%91%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%99%

    Polaris 6: 60% × 53.2 + 40% × 75.3 = 62

    MP93 Nordicca: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 74.6 = 66

  2. 81

    Wet

    Polaris 6 +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePolaris 6MP93 Nordicca
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 6 tests8375
    Reviews found online7875
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–183%93%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%96%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–087%83%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–194%95%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%93%

    Polaris 6: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 78.3 = 81

    MP93 Nordicca: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 74.9 = 75

  3. 78

    Snow

    Polaris 6 +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePolaris 6MP93 Nordicca
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 4 tests8172
    Reviews found online7373
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–099%98%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%95%
    Snow Slalom (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%96%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–095%93%

    Polaris 6: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 73.4 = 78

    MP93 Nordicca: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 72.9 = 72

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Polaris 6 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePolaris 6MP93 Nordicca
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests7061
    Reviews found online7373
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–086%80%

    Polaris 6: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 72.7 = 72

    MP93 Nordicca: 40% × 60.7 + 60% × 73 = 68

  5. 87

    Noise

    Polaris 6 +11
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePolaris 6MP93 Nordicca
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests10083
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%99%

    Polaris 6: 60% × 100 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 87

    MP93 Nordicca: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76

    No owner ratings of noise for Polaris 6 or MP93 Nordicca. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    MP93 Nordicca +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePolaris 6MP93 Nordicca
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 2 tests6470
    Reviews found online7674
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–190%96%

    Polaris 6: 60% × 63.7 + 40% × 76.3 = 69

    MP93 Nordicca: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 74.2 = 72

  7. 76

    Handling (owners)

    Polaris 6 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePolaris 6MP93 Nordicca
    Reviews found online7675
  8. 85

    Efficiency

    Polaris 6 +14
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePolaris 6MP93 Nordicca
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests8571
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–186%89%
Scores at a glance
Barum Polaris 6 vs Matador MP93 Nordicca: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBarum Polaris 6Matador MP93 Nordicca
Relative Score 74 72
Dry 62 66
Wet 81 75
Snow 78 72
Comfort 72 68
Noise 87 76
Treadwear 69 72
Handling (owners) 76 75
Efficiency 85 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Polaris 6

± 6

MP93 Nordicca

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Barum Polaris 6 finished ahead 2 times and Matador MP93 Nordicca 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryPolaris 6MP93 NordiccaΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 90% 91% −0.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Dry Handling Dry 98% 99% −1.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 83% 93% −10.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% 96% −0.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Braking Wet 87% 83% +4.4 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Circle Wet 94% 95% −0.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Handling Wet 94% 93% +1.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Braking Snow 99% 98% +1.3 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Handling Snow 97% 95% +2.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Slalom Snow 99% 96% +3.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Traction Snow 95% 93% +2.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 86% 80% +6.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Noise Noise 100% 99% +1.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wear Treadwear 90% 96% −6.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 86% 89% −3.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Value Cost 73% 85% −12.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Overall Ranking Overall #10/20 #16/20 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Polaris 6

Pros

  • High affordability and excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Incredible quietness and ride comfort
  • Good initial grip on snow and ice compared to all-season tires

Cons

  • Noticeable initial wobbly feeling or sidewall flex
  • Limited long-term durability data available from early adopters
All owner themes in the Polaris 6 review

Tire B MP93 Nordicca

Pros

  • Quiet on dry roads at various speeds, with noise described as almost unnoticeable or 'not bad'
  • Good handling, steering response and road feedback, including praise for the feel despite a thick winter-tire sidewall
  • Strong grip across conditions: wet, dry, cold tarmac, snow (notably lateral snow grip) and ice

Cons

  • Long-term durability and performance retention are unproven; several reviewers explicitly say they cannot yet judge wear
  • Not a performance-oriented tire; one reviewer cautions against expecting much beyond basic, safe winter capability
  • Limited verification in severe winter conditions, as some reviewers had little or no snow and ice exposure
All owner themes in the MP93 Nordicca review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Barum Polaris 6 B · Matador MP93 Nordicca
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available9281
Rim diameters14″ – 20″13″ – 20″
Sizes in common6868

Which one should you actually buy?

Barum Polaris 6

Matador MP93 Nordicca

Narrow edge: Barum Polaris 6 — better efficiency, noise and wet. Pick the Matador MP93 Nordicca if dry and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Barum Polaris 6 scores 85 vs 71 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Barum Polaris 6 scores 87 vs 76 on noise.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Barum Polaris 6 scores 81 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Barum Polaris 6 scores 78 vs 72 on snow.

Tire A · Barum Polaris 6
Tire B · Matador MP93 Nordicca

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Polaris 6 or MP93 Nordicca?

Which is better in the wet, Polaris 6 or MP93 Nordicca?

Barum Polaris 6, 81 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Polaris 6 or MP93 Nordicca?

Matador MP93 Nordicca, 66 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Polaris 6 or MP93 Nordicca?

Barum Polaris 6, 78 vs 72 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Polaris 6 or MP93 Nordicca?

Barum Polaris 6, 87 vs 76 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Polaris 6 or MP93 Nordicca?

Barum Polaris 6, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Polaris 6 or MP93 Nordicca?

Matador MP93 Nordicca, 72 vs 69 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Polaris 6 or MP93 Nordicca?

Barum Polaris 6, 85 vs 71 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology