BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1 + 78 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA31
Tire BKumho

Solus TA31

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 78 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    57
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online–51

    Solus TA31: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 57

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    54
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online–43

    Solus TA31: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 54

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–55

    Solus TA31: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 55.1 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–60

    Solus TA31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    57
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online–51

    Solus TA31: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportSolus TA31
    Reviews found online–50
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport vs Kumho Solus TA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/A SportKumho Solus TA31
Relative Score – 58
Dry – 57
Wet – 60
Snow – 54
Comfort – 60
Noise – 64
Treadwear – 57
Handling (owners) – 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Advantage T/A Sport

± 7

Solus TA31

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advantage T/A Sport

Pros

  • Strong cornering grip and stability
  • Responsive steering feedback
  • Comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise
  • Vague on-center steering feel
All owner themes in the Advantage T/A Sport review

Tire B Solus TA31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Very low road noise and a comfortable, smooth ride
  • Good dry and wet traction for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced high-speed stability and less sharp handling
  • Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, leading to premature replacement
All owner themes in the Solus TA31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport B · Kumho Solus TA31
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—22
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″9.5/32″
UTQG600 - 660 A A500 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport

Kumho Solus TA31

Only Kumho Solus TA31 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology