Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Bridgestone Potenza RE030 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Advantage T/A is ahead, 63–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A

Advantage T/A

High Performance All Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Advantage T/A +4
    59
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/APotenza RE030
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6155

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59

    No road tests of dry for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Advantage T/A +8
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/APotenza RE030
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6251

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56

    No road tests of wet for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/APotenza RE030
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online53–

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Advantage T/A +5
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/APotenza RE030
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5443

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 61

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56

    No road tests of comfort for Advantage T/A or Potenza RE030. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/APotenza RE030
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online59–

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Advantage T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE030 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/APotenza RE030
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6269

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Advantage T/A +7
    49
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/APotenza RE030
    Reviews found online5649
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Bridgestone Potenza RE030: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/ABridgestone Potenza RE030
Relative Score 63 58
Dry 63 59
Wet 64 56
Snow 60 –
Comfort 61 56
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 64 67
Handling (owners) 56 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Advantage T/A

Potenza RE030

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advantage T/A

Pros

  • Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
  • Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions

Cons

  • Highly unpredictable compound performance
  • Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
All owner themes in the Advantage T/A review

Tire B Potenza RE030

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Reliable and consistent dry road grip
  • Strong, stiff sidewall construction

Cons

  • High levels of cabin road noise
  • Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
  • Tendency toward understeer
All owner themes in the Potenza RE030 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A B · Bridgestone Potenza RE030
CategoryHigh Performance All Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG560 - 680 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A

Bridgestone Potenza RE030

Winner: BFGoodrich Advantage T/A — better wet, handling and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE030 if treadwear matters most to you. BFGoodrich Advantage T/A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 64 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 56 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 61 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 63 vs 59 on dry.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE030

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Advantage T/A or Potenza RE030?

Which is better in the wet, Advantage T/A or Potenza RE030?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 64 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Advantage T/A or Potenza RE030?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 63 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Advantage T/A or Potenza RE030?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 61 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Advantage T/A or Potenza RE030?

Bridgestone Potenza RE030, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology