Kumho Ecsta 712 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Kumho Ecsta 712 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Advantage T/A is ahead, 63–48

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A

Advantage T/A

High Performance All Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews

Kumho Ecsta 712
Tire BKumho

Ecsta 712

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Advantage T/A +15
    48
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/AEcsta 712
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online6137

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 55.4 (est.) + 40% × 37.1 = 48

    No road tests of dry for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Advantage T/A +20
    44
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/AEcsta 712
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 50 (est.)
    Reviews found online6235

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 44

    No road tests of wet for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/AEcsta 712
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online53–

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Advantage T/A +10
    51
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/AEcsta 712
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5433

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 61

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 33.2 = 51

    No road tests of comfort for Advantage T/A or Ecsta 712. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/AEcsta 712
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online59–

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Advantage T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Advantage T/A +5
    59
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/AEcsta 712
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6254

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59

    No road tests of treadwear for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Advantage T/A +22
    34
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/AEcsta 712
    Reviews found online5634
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Kumho Ecsta 712: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/AKumho Ecsta 712
Relative Score 63 48
Dry 63 48
Wet 64 44
Snow 60 –
Comfort 61 51
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 64 59
Handling (owners) 56 34

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Advantage T/A

Ecsta 712

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advantage T/A

Pros

  • Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
  • Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions

Cons

  • Highly unpredictable compound performance
  • Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
All owner themes in the Advantage T/A review

Tire B Ecsta 712

Pros

  • Highly competitive price point
  • Better-than-average tread life compared to some premium performance tires
  • Acceptable dry weather handling for casual driving

Cons

  • Dangerous and unpredictable wet weather traction
  • High levels of road noise and harsh ride quality
  • Poor steering feedback and tendency for understeer/oversteer
All owner themes in the Ecsta 712 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A B · Kumho Ecsta 712
CategoryHigh Performance All Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG560 - 680 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A

Kumho Ecsta 712

Winner: BFGoodrich Advantage T/A — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich Advantage T/A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Kumho Ecsta 712 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 56 vs 34 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 64 vs 44 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 63 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 61 vs 51 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta 712

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Advantage T/A or Ecsta 712?

Which is better in the wet, Advantage T/A or Ecsta 712?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 64 vs 44 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Advantage T/A or Ecsta 712?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 63 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Advantage T/A or Ecsta 712?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 61 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Advantage T/A or Ecsta 712?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 64 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology