Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Kumho Sense KR26 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Advantage T/A is ahead, 62–47
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 37 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Advantage T/A +1647Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 61 35 Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63
Sense KR26: 60% × 54.6 (est.) + 40% × 35 = 47
No road tests of dry for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
Advantage T/A +2440Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 47 (est.) Reviews found online 62 29 Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
Sense KR26: 60% × 46.8 (est.) + 40% × 28.8 = 40
No road tests of wet for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
60
Snow
Advantage T/A +1842Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 53 24 Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 60
Sense KR26: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 24 = 42
No road tests of snow for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
61
Comfort
Advantage T/A +754Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 54 40 Advantage T/A: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 61
Sense KR26: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Advantage T/A or Sense KR26. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
Advantage T/A +460Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 59 48 Advantage T/A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64
Sense KR26: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 60
No road tests of noise for Advantage T/A or Sense KR26. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Advantage T/A +1054Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 62 46 Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Sense KR26: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 45.9 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
56
Handling (owners)
Advantage T/A +1046Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Sense KR26 Reviews found online 56 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Kumho Sense KR26 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 47 |
| Dry | 63 | 47 |
| Wet | 64 | 40 |
| Snow | 60 | 42 |
| Comfort | 61 | 54 |
| Noise | 64 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 56 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Advantage T/A
Sense KR26
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advantage T/A
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Tire B Sense KR26
Pros
- Affordable price point appealing to budget-conscious drivers
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Smooth and pleasant driving dynamics when new
Cons
- Rapid degradation of wet-weather traction after 15,000 to 25,000 miles
- Uneven tread wear and balancing issues at higher mileage
- Poor dry and wet grip reported by some users as the tires age
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Kumho Sense KR26 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 17 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | 460 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 40,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Kumho Sense KR26
Winner: BFGoodrich Advantage T/A — better wet, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich Advantage T/A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Kumho Sense KR26 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 64 vs 40 on wet.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 60 vs 42 on snow.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 63 vs 47 on dry.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 64 vs 54 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?
Which is better in the wet, Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 64 vs 40 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 63 vs 47 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 60 vs 42 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 64 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 61 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 64 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology