Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Kumho Sense KR26 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Advantage T/A is ahead, 62–47

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A

Advantage T/A

High Performance All Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews

Kumho Sense KR26
Tire BKumho

Sense KR26

All Season Premium Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 37 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Advantage T/A +16
    47
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ASense KR26
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online6135

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63

    Sense KR26: 60% × 54.6 (est.) + 40% × 35 = 47

    No road tests of dry for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Advantage T/A +24
    40
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ASense KR26
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 47 (est.)
    Reviews found online6229

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64

    Sense KR26: 60% × 46.8 (est.) + 40% × 28.8 = 40

    No road tests of wet for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    Advantage T/A +18
    42
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ASense KR26
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online5324

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 60

    Sense KR26: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 24 = 42

    No road tests of snow for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Advantage T/A +7
    54
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ASense KR26
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5440

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 61

    Sense KR26: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Advantage T/A or Sense KR26. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    Advantage T/A +4
    60
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ASense KR26
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5948

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64

    Sense KR26: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 60

    No road tests of noise for Advantage T/A or Sense KR26. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Advantage T/A +10
    54
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ASense KR26
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6246

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Sense KR26: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 45.9 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Advantage T/A +10
    46
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ASense KR26
    Reviews found online5646
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Kumho Sense KR26: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/AKumho Sense KR26
Relative Score 62 47
Dry 63 47
Wet 64 40
Snow 60 42
Comfort 61 54
Noise 64 60
Treadwear 64 54
Handling (owners) 56 46

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Advantage T/A

Sense KR26

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advantage T/A

Pros

  • Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
  • Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions

Cons

  • Highly unpredictable compound performance
  • Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
All owner themes in the Advantage T/A review

Tire B Sense KR26

Pros

  • Affordable price point appealing to budget-conscious drivers
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Smooth and pleasant driving dynamics when new

Cons

  • Rapid degradation of wet-weather traction after 15,000 to 25,000 miles
  • Uneven tread wear and balancing issues at higher mileage
  • Poor dry and wet grip reported by some users as the tires age
All owner themes in the Sense KR26 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A B · Kumho Sense KR26
CategoryHigh Performance All Season tireAll Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—17
Rim diameters—13″ – 17″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″9.5/32″
UTQG560 - 680 A A - B460 A B
Treadwear warranty—40,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A

Kumho Sense KR26

Winner: BFGoodrich Advantage T/A — better wet, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich Advantage T/A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Kumho Sense KR26 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 64 vs 40 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 60 vs 42 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 63 vs 47 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 64 vs 54 on treadwear.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Kumho Sense KR26

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?

Which is better in the wet, Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 64 vs 40 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 63 vs 47 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 60 vs 42 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 64 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 61 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Advantage T/A or Sense KR26?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 64 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology