Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 6 reviews
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport vs General G-MAX RS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 6 + 567 owner reviews. How we score
G-MAX RS leads, 70–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 61 · 567 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“G-max rs I put 7k miles on these tires and this is the front how many miles would you say I have before problems occur I plan on replacing in a few weeks Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Level70Why this score
Source g-Force Sport G-MAX RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 71 71 g-Force Sport: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70
G-MAX RS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 70
No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for G-MAX RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
G-MAX RS +172Why this score
Source g-Force Sport G-MAX RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 71 73 g-Force Sport: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 71
G-MAX RS: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 72
No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for G-MAX RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison33Why this score
Source g-Force Sport G-MAX RS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 48 (est.) Reviews found online – 10 G-MAX RS: 60% × 48 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 33
No road tests of snow for G-MAX RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
67
Comfort
g-Force Sport +166Why this score
Source g-Force Sport G-MAX RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 66 64 g-Force Sport: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67
G-MAX RS: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 64.2 = 66
No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport or G-MAX RS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison62Why this score
Source g-Force Sport G-MAX RS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 56 G-MAX RS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 62
No road tests of noise for G-MAX RS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Treadwear
G-MAX RS +1070Why this score
Source g-Force Sport G-MAX RS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 56 66 g-Force Sport: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 60
G-MAX RS: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 65.5 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
68
Handling (owners)
g-Force Sport +365Why this score
Source g-Force Sport G-MAX RS Reviews found online 68 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Sport | General G-MAX RS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 70 |
| Dry | 70 | 70 |
| Wet | 71 | 72 |
| Snow | – | 33 |
| Comfort | 67 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 62 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
g-Force Sport
G-MAX RS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Sport
Pros
- Excellent dry surface grip and handling
- High value-to-performance ratio
- Quiet operation compared to factory tires
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Inconsistent performance in wet conditions
- Potential for premature degradation
Tire B G-MAX RS
Pros
- Outstanding price-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
- Strong dry and wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance tire
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to some squirm or less crisp steering response during hard cornering
- Prone to temporary flat-spotting or vibration when sitting overnight in cooler weather
- Unpredictable or slippery performance if driven in cold temperatures below 45 degrees Fahrenheit
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
General G-MAX RS
Community sentiment toward the General G-MAX RS is broadly positive, with users frequently praising its exceptional value and strong dry and wet traction as a budget-friendly ultra-high-performance summer tire. While often favorably compared against premium alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S or Firestone Indy 500, some owners note compromises including elevated road noise and occasional handling inconsistencies on specific sports car platforms.
“I'm going to get the Firestones or General G-MAX RS tires when the previous owners Michelin all-season tires wear out. I want a summer performance tire. Leaning towards the Firestone since they have better dry performance than the Generals. The Generals do better in the wet according to the performance test they both were in.”
“I've had General G-Max RS on the E36 M3 for the past two summers and have no complaints. Just normal/spirited driving. No actual performance driving. I know it's not the tire model but it's all I can offer.”
“I do the Indy 500's but was thinking about going with the General G-Max RS for the higher speed rating.. 305/35r20's on 10.5 wheels General’s G-Max RS May Change The Way UHP Tires Are Made! - Hot Rod Network”
Based on 53 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport | B · General G-MAX RS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 48 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 360 - 700 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
General G-MAX RS
Narrow edge: General G-MAX RS — better treadwear. Where the BFGoodrich g-Force Sport is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
General G-MAX RS scores 70 vs 60 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force Sport or G-MAX RS?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force Sport or G-MAX RS?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Sport or G-MAX RS?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force Sport or G-MAX RS?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, g-Force Sport or G-MAX RS?
General G-MAX RS, 70 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology