Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 3 reviews
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom vs General AltiMAX RT43 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 3 + 1,371 owner reviews. How we score
Winter Slalom leads, 70–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 1,371 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I have the General Altimax RT43 on 19s as my winter tires, and they are perfectly fine. For sure louder than oem, because there is no foam, but for wear, tear and handling, perfectly fine. I am not racing anyone or driving aggressively with those tires on anyway.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Level68Why this score
Source Winter Slalom AltiMAX RT43 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 68 68 Winter Slalom: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68
AltiMAX RT43: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68
No road tests of dry for Winter Slalom. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for AltiMAX RT43. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
Winter Slalom +470Why this score
Source Winter Slalom AltiMAX RT43 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 70 Winter Slalom: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 74
AltiMAX RT43: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
No road tests of wet for Winter Slalom. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for AltiMAX RT43. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison64Why this score
Source Winter Slalom AltiMAX RT43 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 60 AltiMAX RT43: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 64
No road tests of snow for AltiMAX RT43. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
70
Comfort
Winter Slalom +367Why this score
Source Winter Slalom AltiMAX RT43 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 71 65 Winter Slalom: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70
AltiMAX RT43: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Winter Slalom or AltiMAX RT43. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Winter Slalom AltiMAX RT43 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 73 AltiMAX RT43: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 70
No road tests of noise for AltiMAX RT43. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
AltiMAX RT43 +369Why this score
Source Winter Slalom AltiMAX RT43 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 67 67 Winter Slalom: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 66
AltiMAX RT43: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 67.3 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Winter Slalom. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
67
Handling (owners)
Winter Slalom +265Why this score
Source Winter Slalom AltiMAX RT43 Reviews found online 67 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Winter Slalom | General AltiMAX RT43 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 68 |
| Dry | 68 | 68 |
| Wet | 74 | 70 |
| Snow | – | 64 |
| Comfort | 70 | 67 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Winter Slalom
AltiMAX RT43
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Winter Slalom
Pros
- Strong traction in snow and wet conditions
- Aggressive tread profile
- Low road noise
Cons
- Significant loss of grip as the tire ages
- Performance degradation on wet surfaces after several years of use
Tire B AltiMAX RT43
Pros
- Excellent value and lower price point compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Quiet and smooth ride quality with minimal road noise
- Strong wet and dry traction with dependable hydroplaning resistance
Cons
- Occasional balancing difficulties or vibrations reported by some users
- Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly spongy handling or reduced cornering sharpness
- Winter and snow performance can diminish notably as the tread wears down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
General AltiMAX RT43
Community sentiment for the General AltiMAX RT43 is predominantly positive, with reviewers praising its comfort, strong winter and wet weather capability, and solid value as a budget-to-midrange touring tire. However, critics frequently point out soft sidewalls, tramlining on grooved surfaces, and mediocre handling or dry grip under aggressive driving. Tread life reports are mixed, with many reaching 50,000 to 80,000 miles while others report premature wear around 30,000 miles.
“While not a muscle car, my 96 Ford Ranger has 14x7 aluminum wheels. I ran a set of 225/70-14 Coopers on it with no problem. I got about 35K miles, if I remember correctly. I replaced them with General Altima RT43's when they wore out. Mainly just because the Generals were a few bucks cheaper on my little beater truck. But, I am liking these General tires pretty well too. They have white letters, but they don't look as "muscle car" as the Coopers. I will probably get a set of the Coopers in the near future for the 14"road wheels on my 67 Coronet. I currently have BFG's that look perfect. But, I bought them in 2003....”
“I'll be passing on this; I was very disappointed in the RT43. Very soft sidewalls, dry grip was very subpar, wet grip was decent, hydroplane resistance was pretty good. It also tramlined and followed grooves like crazy - worse than the Yoko A13C that came OEM on the Evo - which was the previous top tramlining tire I used.”
“I will start by saying that I ordered a set of 4 from TireRack and although I found them just a little bit cheaper on other sites (after the fact), I have no complaints about it as I still only paid ~$70-ish per tire and received them within two days. Secondly, being that I live in New England, wet and snow traction is very high on my list of priorities and lucky for me, it snowed heavily 3 days after having them mounted. I was entering a parking lot that had not been plowed yet and know for a FACT my car would have just spun tires and left me stuck. But not with these. The car seemed to shake left and right a little until it made it to the pavement and easily made it through. I have never felt so confident in the snow before with my little Fit. And then last night. My wife and I went out to dinner and I decided to move my car as I spotted a better parking spot which required a fast and illegal u-turn. I pressed the accelerator hard which typically would squeal the tires but these gripped immediately and the Fit just took off. I strongly recommend them! Oh, and they're rated for a supposed 70,000 miles.”
Based on 261 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Winter Slalom | B · General AltiMAX RT43 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Touring tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 600 - 700 A A - B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom
General AltiMAX RT43
Narrow edge: BFGoodrich Winter Slalom — better wet and comfort. Pick the General AltiMAX RT43 if treadwear matters most to you. BFGoodrich Winter Slalom rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom scores 74 vs 70 on wet.
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom scores 70 vs 67 on comfort.
General AltiMAX RT43 scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Winter Slalom or AltiMAX RT43?
Which is better in the wet, Winter Slalom or AltiMAX RT43?
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom, 74 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Winter Slalom or AltiMAX RT43?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Winter Slalom or AltiMAX RT43?
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Winter Slalom or AltiMAX RT43?
General AltiMAX RT43, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology