Yokohama C Drive looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone B 390 vs Yokohama C Drive — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 45 owner reviews. How we score

C Drive leads, 71–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone B 390

B 390

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 10 reviews

Yokohama C Drive
Tire BYokohama

C Drive

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 45 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    C Drive +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceB 390C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6873

    B 390: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68

    C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71

    No road tests of dry for B 390. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    C Drive +5
    74
    Why this score
    SourceB 390C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6975

    B 390: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 69

    C Drive: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for B 390. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 49

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceB 390C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)–
    Reviews found online36–

    B 390: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 49

    No road tests of snow for B 390. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    C Drive +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceB 390C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6574

    B 390: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 67

    C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for B 390 or C Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    C Drive +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceB 390C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6467

    B 390: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    C Drive: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for B 390. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 67

    Handling (owners)

    C Drive +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceB 390C Drive
    Reviews found online6772
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone B 390 vs Yokohama C Drive: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone B 390Yokohama C Drive
Relative Score 68 71
Dry 68 71
Wet 69 74
Snow 49 –
Comfort 67 72
Treadwear 65 66
Handling (owners) 67 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

B 390

C Drive

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A B 390

Pros

  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
  • Solid performance as an original equipment factory fitment
  • Good durability when used in low-mileage or climate-controlled conditions

Cons

  • Short tread life reported by many users
  • Noticeable road noise, particularly from the rear axle
  • Tendency for the vehicle to wander or track poorly at highway speeds
All owner themes in the B 390 review

Tire B C Drive

Pros

  • Excellent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Predictable, progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
  • Some users report increased noise and stiffness as the tire ages
  • Mixed feedback on dry grip performance under aggressive driving conditions
All owner themes in the C Drive review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone B 390 B · Yokohama C Drive
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone B 390

Yokohama C Drive

Narrow edge: Yokohama C Drive — better wet, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone B 390 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama C Drive scores 74 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama C Drive scores 72 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama C Drive scores 71 vs 68 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone B 390
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

B 390 or C Drive?

Which is better in the wet, B 390 or C Drive?

Yokohama C Drive, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, B 390 or C Drive?

Yokohama C Drive, 71 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, B 390 or C Drive?

Yokohama C Drive, 72 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, B 390 or C Drive?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology