Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 10 reviews
Yokohama C Drive looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone B 390 vs Yokohama C Drive — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 45 owner reviews. How we score
C Drive leads, 71–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
C Drive +371Why this score
Source B 390 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 68 73 B 390: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68
C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71
No road tests of dry for B 390. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
69
Wet
C Drive +574Why this score
Source B 390 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 69 75 B 390: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 69
C Drive: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
No road tests of wet for B 390. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
49
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source B 390 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) – Reviews found online 36 – B 390: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 49
No road tests of snow for B 390. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
67
Comfort
C Drive +572Why this score
Source B 390 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 65 74 B 390: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 67
C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72
No road tests of comfort for B 390 or C Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
C Drive +166Why this score
Source B 390 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 64 67 B 390: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
C Drive: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for B 390. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
67
Handling (owners)
C Drive +572Why this score
Source B 390 C Drive Reviews found online 67 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone B 390 | Yokohama C Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 71 |
| Dry | 68 | 71 |
| Wet | 69 | 74 |
| Snow | 49 | – |
| Comfort | 67 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
B 390
C Drive
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A B 390
Pros
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Solid performance as an original equipment factory fitment
- Good durability when used in low-mileage or climate-controlled conditions
Cons
- Short tread life reported by many users
- Noticeable road noise, particularly from the rear axle
- Tendency for the vehicle to wander or track poorly at highway speeds
Tire B C Drive
Pros
- Excellent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable, progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
- Some users report increased noise and stiffness as the tire ages
- Mixed feedback on dry grip performance under aggressive driving conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone B 390 | B · Yokohama C Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone B 390
Yokohama C Drive
Narrow edge: Yokohama C Drive — better wet, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone B 390 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama C Drive scores 74 vs 69 on wet.
Yokohama C Drive scores 72 vs 67 on comfort.
Yokohama C Drive scores 71 vs 68 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
B 390 or C Drive?
Which is better in the wet, B 390 or C Drive?
Yokohama C Drive, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, B 390 or C Drive?
Yokohama C Drive, 71 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, B 390 or C Drive?
Yokohama C Drive, 72 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, B 390 or C Drive?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology