Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 5 reviews
Bridgestone Battlax SC vs Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 5 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Battlax SC is ahead, 74–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 47 · 1 test Owners 71 · 9 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
78
Dry
Battlax SC +870Why this score
Source Battlax SC Battlax Sport Touring T32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 83 72 Battlax SC: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.8 = 78
Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
No road tests of dry for Battlax SC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
74
Wet
Battlax SC +1460Why this score
Source Battlax SC Battlax Sport Touring T32 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 47 Reviews found online 76 78 Battlax SC: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 74
Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 47.5 + 40% × 78.3 = 60
No road tests of wet for Battlax SC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
75
Comfort
Battlax SC +273Why this score
Source Battlax SC Battlax Sport Touring T32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 78 75 Battlax SC: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 78.2 = 75
Battlax Sport Touring T32: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 75 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Battlax SC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
63
Treadwear
Battlax Sport Touring T32 +164Why this score
Source Battlax SC Battlax Sport Touring T32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 60 62 Battlax SC: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax SC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
82
Handling (owners)
Battlax SC +775Why this score
Source Battlax SC Battlax Sport Touring T32 Reviews found online 82 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax SC | Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 66 |
| Dry | 78 | 70 |
| Wet | 74 | 60 |
| Comfort | 75 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 82 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Battlax SC
Battlax Sport Touring T32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax SC
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
- Improved ride comfort and smoothness over uneven pavement
- Predictable handling and feedback compared to stock alternatives
Cons
- Rapid rear tire wear
- Limited longevity, often requiring replacement in under 3,000 miles
- High frequency of replacement intervals for daily riders
Tire B Battlax Sport Touring T32
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather performance and heavy rain confidence
- High-speed stability, including at autobahn speeds with full luggage
- Immediate improvement in handling agility and steering feel compared to competitors or older tires
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear and relatively low mileage lifespan
- Rear tire can slip or slide when pushed hard in dry, warm conditions
- Reduced performance feel after a few thousand miles of use
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax SC | B · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Battlax SC
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32
Winner: Bridgestone Battlax SC — better wet, dry and handling. Where the Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Battlax SC rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Battlax SC scores 74 vs 60 on wet.
Bridgestone Battlax SC scores 78 vs 70 on dry.
Bridgestone Battlax SC scores 82 vs 75 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax SC or Battlax Sport Touring T32?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax SC or Battlax Sport Touring T32?
Bridgestone Battlax SC, 74 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax SC or Battlax Sport Touring T32?
Bridgestone Battlax SC, 78 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax SC or Battlax Sport Touring T32?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Battlax SC or Battlax Sport Touring T32?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology