Tests 47 · 1 test Owners 71 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 vs Pirelli Diablo Rosso II — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 9 + 19 owner reviews. How we score
Diablo Rosso II is ahead, 73–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 19 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Diablo Rosso II +575Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Diablo Rosso II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 72 79 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
Diablo Rosso II: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75
No road tests of dry for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Diablo Rosso II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
60
Wet
Diablo Rosso II +1272Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Diablo Rosso II Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 47 ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 78 73 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 47.5 + 40% × 78.3 = 60
Diablo Rosso II: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 72
No road tests of wet for Diablo Rosso II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Comfort
Level73Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Diablo Rosso II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 75 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 75 = 73
Diablo Rosso II: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 75.2 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Diablo Rosso II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Diablo Rosso II +367Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Diablo Rosso II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 62 67 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
Diablo Rosso II: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Diablo Rosso II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
Diablo Rosso II +277Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Diablo Rosso II Reviews found online 75 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | Pirelli Diablo Rosso II |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 73 |
| Dry | 70 | 75 |
| Wet | 60 | 72 |
| Comfort | 73 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Battlax Sport Touring T32
Diablo Rosso II
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax Sport Touring T32
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather performance and heavy rain confidence
- High-speed stability, including at autobahn speeds with full luggage
- Immediate improvement in handling agility and steering feel compared to competitors or older tires
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear and relatively low mileage lifespan
- Rear tire can slip or slide when pushed hard in dry, warm conditions
- Reduced performance feel after a few thousand miles of use
Tire B Diablo Rosso II
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering stability
- Rapid warm-up time for immediate performance
- Predictable handling and high levels of rider feedback
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of rapid center wear and cupping
- Polarized wet-weather performance ranging from 'glue-like' to 'dangerous'
- Tendency for the rear tire to square off over time
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | B · Pirelli Diablo Rosso II |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32
Pirelli Diablo Rosso II
Winner: Pirelli Diablo Rosso II — better wet, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Diablo Rosso II rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pirelli Diablo Rosso II scores 72 vs 60 on wet.
Pirelli Diablo Rosso II scores 75 vs 70 on dry.
Pirelli Diablo Rosso II scores 67 vs 64 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Diablo Rosso II?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Diablo Rosso II?
Pirelli Diablo Rosso II, 72 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Diablo Rosso II?
Pirelli Diablo Rosso II, 75 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Diablo Rosso II?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Diablo Rosso II?
Pirelli Diablo Rosso II, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology