Tests 80 · 25 tests Owners 80 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 55 in 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 25 + 3 road tests and 9 + 0 owner reviews. How we score
Blizzak 6 is ahead, 80–72
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 25 tests Owners 80 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 55 in 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)
Tests 72 · 3 tests Owners – · none yet
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2026 AvD Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Blizzak 6 | Observe EWS1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 2 tests | 77 | 85 |
| Reviews found online | 83 | ≈ 75 (est.) |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 95% | 100% |
Blizzak 6: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 82.6 = 79
Observe EWS1: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 74.8 (est.) = 81
No owner ratings of dry for Observe EWS1. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Blizzak 6 | Observe EWS1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / 3 tests | 93 | 93 |
| Reviews found online | 86 | ≈ 83 (est.) |
| Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 78% | 94% |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 91% | 95% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 | 96% | 97% |
| Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 96% |
Blizzak 6: 60% × 93.3 + 40% × 86 = 90
Observe EWS1: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 82.8 (est.) = 89
No owner ratings of wet for Observe EWS1. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Blizzak 6 | Observe EWS1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 24 / 3 tests | 81 | 43 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 92% | 94% |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 | 96% | 89% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 93% | 84% |
Blizzak 6: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 78 = 80
Observe EWS1: 60% × 42.6 + 40% × 61.6 (est.) = 50
No owner ratings of snow for Observe EWS1. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Blizzak 6 | Observe EWS1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests | 87 | – |
| Reviews found online | 78 | – |
Blizzak 6: 40% × 87.2 + 60% × 77.9 = 82
| Source | Blizzak 6 | Observe EWS1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 1 tests | 51 | 52 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 96% | 95% |
Blizzak 6: 60% × 51.3 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 57
Observe EWS1: 60% × 51.5 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 57
No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak 6 or Observe EWS1. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Blizzak 6 | Observe EWS1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 2 tests | 77 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 66% | 76% |
| Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 77% | 80% |
Blizzak 6: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 76
Observe EWS1: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 69.3 (est.) = 72
No owner ratings of treadwear for Observe EWS1. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Blizzak 6 | Observe EWS1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 83 | – |
| Source | Blizzak 6 | Observe EWS1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 2 tests | 82 | 49 |
| Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 93% | 91% |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 82% |
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | Toyo Observe EWS1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 72 |
| Dry | 79 | 81 |
| Wet | 90 | 89 |
| Snow | 80 | 50 |
| Comfort | 82 | – |
| Noise | 57 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 76 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 83 | – |
| Efficiency | 82 | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak 6
Observe EWS1
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Blizzak 6 finished ahead 3 times and Toyo Observe EWS1 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak 6 | Observe EWS1 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% | 100% | −4.4 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 AvD Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 78% | 94% | −15.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 · 225/50 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 91% | 95% | −3.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 · 225/50 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% | 97% | −0.5 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 AvD Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Braking (concrete) | Wet | 99% | 96% | +3.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 · 225/50 R17 |
| Ice Braking | Snow | 92% | 94% | −1.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 · 225/50 R17 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 96% | 89% | +6.8 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 AvD Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 93% | 84% | +9.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 · 225/50 R17 |
| Noise | Noise | 96% | 95% | +0.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 · 225/50 R17 |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 66% | 76% | −10.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 · 225/50 R17 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 77% | 80% | −3.2 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 AvD Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 93% | 91% | +1.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 · 225/50 R17 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% | 82% | +17.6 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AvD Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Value | Cost | 56% | 81% | −24.9 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 AvD Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/15 | #12/15 | – | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 AvD Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | B · Toyo Observe EWS1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 192 | 72 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 71 | 71 |
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Toyo Observe EWS1
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 — better efficiency, snow and treadwear. Where the Toyo Observe EWS1 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 scores 82 vs 49 on efficiency.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 scores 80 vs 50 on snow.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 scores 76 vs 72 on treadwear.
Toyo Observe EWS1 won 2 of 2 shared dry braking tests.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 90 vs 89 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 81 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6, 80 vs 50 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 57 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6, 76 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6, 82 vs 49 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology