Tests 60 · 5 tests Owners 66 · 3 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 17 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (exterior noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Blizzak Ice vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 3 road tests and 3 + 1,072 owner reviews. How we score
Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 78–63
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 3 tests Owners 85 · 1,072 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Agilis CrossClimate +1479Why this score
Source Blizzak Ice Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 3 tests 64 74 Reviews found online 67 87 Blizzak Ice: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 66.8 = 65
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 87 = 79
-
54
Wet
Agilis CrossClimate +2478Why this score
Source Blizzak Ice Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 3 tests 44 71 Reviews found online 70 88 Blizzak Ice: 60% × 43.6 + 40% × 69.6 = 54
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 87.8 = 78
-
62
Snow
Agilis CrossClimate +1678Why this score
Source Blizzak Ice Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 3 tests 63 76 Reviews found online 62 82 Blizzak Ice: 60% × 62.6 + 40% × 61.9 = 62
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 81.6 = 78
-
67
Comfort
Agilis CrossClimate +471Why this score
Source Blizzak Ice Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 70 55 Reviews found online 65 81 Blizzak Ice: 40% × 70 + 60% × 65.3 = 67
Agilis CrossClimate: 40% × 54.8 + 60% × 81.1 = 71
-
76
Noise
Level76Why this score
Source Blizzak Ice Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 2 tests 83 82 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Blizzak Ice: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 82 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76
No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak Ice or Agilis CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
67
Treadwear
Agilis CrossClimate +1178Why this score
Source Blizzak Ice Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 67 85 Blizzak Ice: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Agilis CrossClimate +1681Why this score
Source Blizzak Ice Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online 65 81 -
48
Efficiency
Agilis CrossClimate +2371Why this score
Source Blizzak Ice Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 2 tests 48 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak Ice | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 78 |
| Dry | 65 | 79 |
| Wet | 54 | 78 |
| Snow | 62 | 78 |
| Comfort | 67 | 71 |
| Noise | 76 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 81 |
| Efficiency | 48 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
Blizzak Ice
78
/ 100
Agilis CrossClimate
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak Ice | Agilis CrossClimate | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 | 100% #1/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 80% #3/17 · 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 | 97% #2/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 80% #2/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 | 90% #2/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 70% #5/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 | 98% #2/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 60% #19/17 · 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 | 97% #6/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 60% #18/17 · 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 | 70% #5/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 80% #5/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 | 98% #3/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 80% #4/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 | 99% #2/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 80% #5/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 | 95% #4/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% #1/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 | 70% #4/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #1/8 · 2023 Studless Friction Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 70% #10/17 · 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 | 90% #3/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/7 2025 Moottori Studless Winter Tire Test R16 | #2/6 promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak Ice
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Agilis CrossClimate
Pros
- Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling
Cons
- Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
- Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
- A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Blizzak Ice
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.
vwcaliforniaclub.com
·5 upvotes ·2024-07-02
“I fitted these to our 680 Michelin Agilis Crossclimate 235/60 R17C 117/115R 8PR, 3PMSF And they work well, better off tarmac (Grassy muddy farm track) than the factory tyres and felt better in heavy rain. I can’t recall if ride quality changed tho.”
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2026-10-05
“Costco tire employee here- It can be hard to estimate tire life w/out warranty info. Most members see about 60k miles on the agilis crossclimate and 75k on the defender ltx. The agilis is the better tire for heavy loading but you have to balance that against how fast you'll wear them out. Both are great tires though”
f150forum.com
“I bought a set of Agilis for my 2017 F250 King Ranch two years ago. I live in Colorado and I was attracted to the idea that they could possibly be left on year round and not have to swap between summer and winter tires. I have swapped between summer and winter tires for the past 25 years here in Colorado and I have tried tires that were supposedly "ALL SEASON" but they were always a compromise, not great in the summer and as a highway tire and not great in the winter as a snow or ice tire. The Agilis has been the only tire that has great summer performance, quiet and nice handling and also it has been hard to believe, but they act pretty close to Blizzaks I've had in the past for winter driving. I have 25,000 miles on them and they are wearing very well, and have not become noisy. I'm surprised there are not more accolades on these tires. They came out on top vs several other all season tires.”
Top themes
#Heavy load capability#Winter and snow traction#Tread wear longevity#Defender LTX comparison#C-metric recall notice#Ride comfort and noise#Van and RV use
Based on 54 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak Ice | B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Van |
| Sizes available | 60 | 22 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 19″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Sizes in common | 8 | 8 |
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Bridgestone Blizzak Ice
78
/ 100
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better wet, efficiency and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 54 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 71 vs 48 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 62 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 81 vs 65 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak Ice
Tire B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak Ice or Agilis CrossClimate?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak Ice or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 54 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak Ice or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 79 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak Ice or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 62 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Blizzak Ice or Agilis CrossClimate?
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 76 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak Ice or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 71 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak Ice or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Blizzak Ice or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 71 vs 48 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology