tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Blizzak LM-32 leads, 67–65 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak LM-80 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ABridgestone

Blizzak LM-32

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #9 of 13 in 2010 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Tire BBridgestone

Blizzak LM-80

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 3 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 8 in 2011 Auto Bild 4x4 Winter Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Blizzak LM-32 +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM-80
    Reviews found online6857
  2. 69

    Wet

    Blizzak LM-32 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM-80
    Reviews found online6965
  3. 68

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM-80
    Reviews found online67–
  4. 67

    Comfort

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM-80
    Reviews found online6465
  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM-80
    Reviews found online66–
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM-80 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM-80
    Reviews found online6770
  7. 64

    Handling

    Blizzak LM-32 +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM-80
    Reviews found online6463
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-32Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80
Relative Score 67 65
Dry 68 61
Wet 69 66
Snow 68 –
Comfort 67 67
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 67 68
Handling 64 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Blizzak LM-32

Blizzak LM-80

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM-80ΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 11% #9/13 · 2010 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test 17% #6/8 · 2011 Auto Bild 4x4 Winter Tyre Test −5.6 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-32

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and winter storms
  • Stable and satisfying handling on cold, dry roads
  • Good resistance to aquaplaning and solid durability/tread life reported by some users

Cons

  • Poor and unpredictable wet weather grip, leading to wheel spin and sliding
  • Noticeable road noise and humming that increases as the tread wears down
  • Vague steering feel and lackluster performance under quick acceleration
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-32 review

Tire B Blizzak LM-80

Pros

  • Excellent traction on snow and ice
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong tread wear longevity

Cons

  • Limited feedback on extreme high-speed dry handling
  • Potential for premature wear if used exclusively in high-heat summer conditions
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-80 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80
CategoryWinter—
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available354
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 17″

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 — better dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 68 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 69 vs 66 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

67

Narrow edge

Blizzak LM-32

Amazon