tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 21 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Blizzak LM25 leads, 67–65 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak LM25 or Blizzak LM-32 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6363

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 65

    Blizzak LM25: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Blizzak LM25 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6469

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65

    Blizzak LM25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    Blizzak LM25 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6369

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66

    Blizzak LM25: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Blizzak LM25 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5864

    Blizzak LM-32: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 61

    Blizzak LM25: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 64

    Noise

    Blizzak LM-32 +2
    62
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5957

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 64

    Blizzak LM25: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak LM25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM-32 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6664

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    Blizzak LM25: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 59

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak LM25 +12
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak LM25
    Reviews found online5971
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-32Bridgestone Blizzak LM25
Relative Score 65 67
Dry 65 65
Wet 65 69
Snow 66 70
Comfort 61 65
Noise 64 62
Treadwear 66 65
Handling (owners) 59 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blizzak LM-32

± 8

Blizzak LM25

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-32

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and winter storms
  • Stable and satisfying handling on cold, dry roads
  • Good resistance to aquaplaning and solid durability/tread life reported by some users

Cons

  • Poor and unpredictable wet weather grip, leading to wheel spin and sliding
  • Noticeable road noise and humming that increases as the tread wears down
  • Vague steering feel and lackluster performance under quick acceleration
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-32 review

Tire B Blizzak LM25

Pros

  • Excellent traction and handling in deep snow and winter storms
  • Good grip and road holding in both dry and wet conditions during cold months
  • Sporty feel and well-suited for high-powered rear-wheel-drive sedans and sports cars

Cons

  • Can be slightly noisy or develop saw-tooth wear if not properly maintained
  • Subpar braking performance on pure ice compared to deep snow
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM25 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3610
Rim diameters15″ – 20″16″ – 20″
Tread depth11/32″11/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25

Narrow edge: Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 — better handling, wet and snow. Where the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 scores 71 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 scores 69 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 scores 70 vs 66 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 scores 65 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak LM25?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak LM25?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25, 69 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak LM25?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak LM25?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25, 70 vs 66 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak LM25?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 62 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak LM25?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak LM25?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology