tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Bridgestone Turanza T001 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Blizzak LM-32 leads, 67–64 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak LM-32 or Turanza T001 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ABridgestone

Blizzak LM-32

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 42 in 2012 Auto Bild 42 Winter Tyre Braking Test (overall ranking)

Tire BBridgestone

Turanza T001

Summer

Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 59 · 2,183 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 12 in 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Blizzak LM-32 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Turanza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score)–69
    Reviews found online6861
  2. 69

    Wet

    Turanza T001 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Turanza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score)–76
    Reviews found online6965
  3. 68

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Turanza T001
    Reviews found online66–
  4. 67

    Comfort

    Blizzak LM-32 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Turanza T001
    Reviews found online6461
  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Turanza T001
    Reviews found online66–
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM-32 +9
    58
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Turanza T001
    Reviews found online6752
  7. 64

    Handling

    Blizzak LM-32 +5
    59
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Turanza T001
    Reviews found online6459
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-32Bridgestone Turanza T001
Relative Score 67 64
Dry 68 66
Wet 69 71
Snow 68 –
Comfort 67 65
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 67 58
Handling 64 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Blizzak LM-32

Turanza T001

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM-32Turanza T001ΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 33% #3/42 · 2012 Auto Bild 42 Winter Tyre Braking Test 20% #5/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test +13.3 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-32

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and winter storms
  • Stable and satisfying handling on cold, dry roads
  • Good resistance to aquaplaning and solid durability/tread life reported by some users

Cons

  • Poor and unpredictable wet weather grip, leading to wheel spin and sliding
  • Noticeable road noise and humming that increases as the tread wears down
  • Vague steering feel and lackluster performance under quick acceleration
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-32 review

Tire B Turanza T001

Pros

  • Good dry grip and stable highway handling
  • Comfortable ride quality with low road noise on many surfaces
  • Solid steering feedback and direct road feel

Cons

  • Accelerated and uneven tread wear, particularly on front or drive wheels
  • Inconsistent or poor wet grip, with several users reporting aquaplaning risks
  • Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh or firm ride over uneven surfaces
All owner themes in the Turanza T001 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 B · Bridgestone Turanza T001
CategoryWinterSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3537
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 19″
Sidewall—Blackwall

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

Bridgestone Turanza T001

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 — better treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 67 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 64 vs 59 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Turanza T001
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

67

Narrow edge

Blizzak LM-32

Amazon