Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 20 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Firestone Firehawk AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Blizzak LM-32 leads, 67–64 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Blizzak LM-32 +365Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-32 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 68 64 -
69
Wet
Blizzak LM-32 +465Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-32 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 69 64 -
68
Snow
Blizzak LM-32 +662Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-32 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 67 56 -
67
Comfort
Blizzak LM-32 +265Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-32 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 64 61 -
66
Noise
Level66Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-32 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 66 66 -
67
Treadwear
Blizzak LM-32 +166Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-32 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 67 66 -
64
Handling
Blizzak LM-32 +361Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-32 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 64 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | Firestone Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 64 |
| Dry | 68 | 65 |
| Wet | 69 | 65 |
| Snow | 68 | 62 |
| Comfort | 67 | 65 |
| Noise | 66 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 66 |
| Handling | 64 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Blizzak LM-32
Firehawk AS
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak LM-32
Pros
- Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and winter storms
- Stable and satisfying handling on cold, dry roads
- Good resistance to aquaplaning and solid durability/tread life reported by some users
Cons
- Poor and unpredictable wet weather grip, leading to wheel spin and sliding
- Noticeable road noise and humming that increases as the tread wears down
- Vague steering feel and lackluster performance under quick acceleration
Tire B Firehawk AS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
- Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users
Cons
- Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
- Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | B · Firestone Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 35 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 480 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Firestone Firehawk AS
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 — better snow, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 68 vs 62 on snow.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 69 vs 65 on wet.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 68 vs 65 on dry.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 64 vs 61 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.