tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Pilot Alpin 4 is ahead, 77–67

Check price on Amazon · Pilot Alpin 4 or Blizzak LM-32 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ABridgestone

Blizzak LM-32

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #9 of 13 in 2010 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Tire BMichelin

Pilot Alpin 4

Winter

Tests 71 · 3 tests Owners 85 · 28 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 14 in 2011 AMS Winter Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Pilot Alpin 4 +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Pilot Alpin 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)–67
    Reviews found online6887
  2. 69

    Wet

    Pilot Alpin 4 +13
    82
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Pilot Alpin 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)–78
    Reviews found online6988
  3. 68

    Snow

    Pilot Alpin 4 +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Pilot Alpin 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)–72
    Reviews found online6780
  4. 67

    Comfort

    Pilot Alpin 4 +9
    76
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Pilot Alpin 4
    Reviews found online6484
  5. 66

    Noise

    Blizzak LM-32 +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Pilot Alpin 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)–59
    Reviews found online66–
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Pilot Alpin 4 +7
    74
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Pilot Alpin 4
    Reviews found online6781
  7. 64

    Handling

    Pilot Alpin 4 +26
    90
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Pilot Alpin 4
    Reviews found online6490
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-32Michelin Pilot Alpin 4
Relative Score 67 77
Dry 68 75
Wet 69 82
Snow 68 75
Comfort 67 76
Noise 66 62
Treadwear 67 74
Handling 64 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Blizzak LM-32

Pilot Alpin 4

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM-32Pilot Alpin 4ΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 11% #9/13 · 2010 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test 33% #3/14 · 2011 AMS Winter Tyre Test −22.2 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-32

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and winter storms
  • Stable and satisfying handling on cold, dry roads
  • Good resistance to aquaplaning and solid durability/tread life reported by some users

Cons

  • Poor and unpredictable wet weather grip, leading to wheel spin and sliding
  • Noticeable road noise and humming that increases as the tread wears down
  • Vague steering feel and lackluster performance under quick acceleration
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-32 review

Tire B Pilot Alpin 4

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and handling in snow and ice
  • Sporty, responsive handling on dry and wet pavement
  • High level of comfort and low road noise for a winter tire

Cons

  • Higher price point compared to some competitors
  • Above-average noise level reported by a few users due to the aggressive tread pattern
  • Slight initial tread squirm when brand new before settling in
All owner themes in the Pilot Alpin 4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 B · Michelin Pilot Alpin 4
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available35—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

Michelin Pilot Alpin 4

Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 scores 90 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 scores 82 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 scores 76 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 scores 75 vs 68 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Alpin 4
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

77

Leads

Pilot Alpin 4

Amazon