tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 11 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Blizzak LM-25 RFT is ahead, 73–60

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak LM001 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Tire ABridgestone

Blizzak LM001

Winter

± 7

Tests 71 · 2 tests Owners 47 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +10
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM-25 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests71≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4372

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 42.5 = 60

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +12
    77
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM-25 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online5080

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 74.5 + 40% × 50.4 = 65

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 75.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 77

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).

  3. 60

    Snow

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +15
    75
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM-25 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests68≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online4978

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 68.4 + 40% × 48.5 = 60

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 75

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 52

    Comfort

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +17
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM-25 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4370

    Blizzak LM001: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 42.9 = 52

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.5 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 54

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM-25 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests71–
    Reviews found online29–

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 29.2 = 54

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +14
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM-25 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4972

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +14
    68
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM-25 RFT
    Reviews found online5468
  8. 71

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM-25 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests71–
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM001Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Relative Score 60 73
Dry 60 70
Wet 65 77
Snow 60 75
Comfort 52 69
Noise 54 –
Treadwear 56 70
Handling (owners) 54 68
Efficiency 71 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blizzak LM001

± 8

Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM001

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and icy conditions
  • Precise handling and stability on cold, winter-affected roads
  • Reliable braking performance in severe weather

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
  • High noise levels on dry asphalt
  • Increased fuel consumption compared to other winter tires
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM001 review

Tire B Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep, fresh, or compacted snow and ice
  • Transforms rear-wheel-drive vehicles into capable winter drivers
  • Softer, quieter, and more comfortable ride compared to standard summer run-flat tires

Cons

  • Longer braking distances on dry roads when temperatures rise above freezing
  • Reduced braking performance and handling when temperatures exceed 20 degrees Celsius
  • Prone to ABS and ESP activation on slick ice surfaces
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-25 RFT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available69—
Rim diameters14″ – 21″—
Tread depth11/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT — better comfort, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 69 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 75 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 70 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 68 vs 54 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 77 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 70 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 75 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 69 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 70 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology