tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 32 road tests and 11 + 113 owner reviews. How we score

Blizzak LM005 is ahead, 70–60

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak LM005 or Blizzak LM001 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Tire ABridgestone

Blizzak LM001

Winter

± 7

Tests 71 · 2 tests Owners 47 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Tire BBridgestone

Blizzak LM005

Winter

± 4

Tests 73 · 32 tests Owners 59 · 113 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 54 in 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    Blizzak LM005 +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 27 tests7177
    Reviews found online4356

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 42.9 = 60

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 55.8 = 69

  2. 65

    Wet

    Blizzak LM005 +24
    89
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 32 tests75100
    Reviews found online5172

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 50.6 = 65

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 100 + 40% × 71.9 = 89

  3. 61

    Snow

    Blizzak LM005 +12
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 32 tests6979
    Reviews found online4965

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 68.5 + 40% × 49.2 = 61

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 64.7 = 73

  4. 52

    Comfort

    Blizzak LM005 +15
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 64 (est.)78
    Reviews found online4359

    Blizzak LM001: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 43.2 = 52

    Blizzak LM005: 40% × 78.2 + 60% × 59 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM001. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 54

    Noise

    Blizzak LM005 +14
    68
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 25 tests7169
    Reviews found online30≈ 67 (est.)

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 29.7 = 54

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 68

    No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak LM005. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM001 +19
    37
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests≈ 60 (est.)34
    Reviews found online4941

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 48.7 = 56

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 34 + 40% × 40.9 = 37

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak LM005 +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM005
    Reviews found online5461
  8. 71

    Efficiency

    Blizzak LM005 +11
    82
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 27 tests7182
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM001Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Relative Score 60 70
Dry 60 69
Wet 65 89
Snow 61 73
Comfort 52 67
Noise 54 68
Treadwear 56 37
Handling (owners) 54 61
Efficiency 71 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blizzak LM001

± 4

Blizzak LM005

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM001Blizzak LM005ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% #10/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test 96% #10/16 · 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #8/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test 97% #7/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 100% #1/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test 99% #2/16 · 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 91% #7/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/16 · 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 97% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 92% #8/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test 93% #12/16 · 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 98% #6/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test 84% #7/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test 96% #15/16 · 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 85% #8/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test 88% #5/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 61% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test 85% #6/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #6/5 2022 Consumer Reports Performance Winter/Snow Tires #8/16 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM001

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and icy conditions
  • Precise handling and stability on cold, winter-affected roads
  • Reliable braking performance in severe weather

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
  • High noise levels on dry asphalt
  • Increased fuel consumption compared to other winter tires
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM001 review

Tire B Blizzak LM005

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and braking performance on wet roads and heavy rain
  • High driving comfort with low interior noise levels when new
  • Predictable and stable handling characteristics in dry and mild winter conditions

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, with many users reporting the tire wearing out within 5,000 to 15,000 km
  • Noticeable degradation in snow and ice grip by the second or third season
  • Increased tire noise, whining, or humming vibrations as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM005 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available69165
Rim diameters14″ – 21″14″ – 22″
Tread depth11/32″9/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi
Sizes in common6464

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 — better wet, comfort and noise. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 89 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 56 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 67 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 68 vs 54 on noise.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM005?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM005?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 89 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM005?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 69 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM005?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 73 vs 61 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM005?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 68 vs 54 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM005?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 67 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM005?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001, 56 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Blizzak LM001 or Blizzak LM005?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 82 vs 71 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology