Tests 67 · 10 tests Owners 80 · 68 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test (dry braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 10 + 2 road tests and 68 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Winter Sottozero 3 is ahead, 73–59
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 10 tests Owners 80 · 68 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test (dry braking)
Tests 71 · 2 tests Owners 46 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 2 tests | 73 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 82 | 42 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 100% | 98% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 99% | 99% |
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 81.7 = 76
Blizzak LM001: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 42 = 60
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 2 tests | 80 | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 50 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 97% | 95% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 94% | 94% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 98% | 97% |
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 80.4 + 40% × 86.5 = 83
Blizzak LM001: 60% × 74.5 + 40% × 50.3 = 65
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 2 tests | 56 | 68 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 48 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–1 | 94% | 94% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 97% | 98% |
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 56.5 + 40% × 78.8 = 65
Blizzak LM001: 60% × 68.5 + 40% × 48 = 60
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 72 | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 43 |
Winter Sottozero 3: 40% × 72.1 + 60% × 74.5 = 74
Blizzak LM001: 40% × 63.4 (est.) + 60% × 42.6 = 51
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 2 tests | 64 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 82 | 29 |
| Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 98% | 98% |
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 64.4 + 40% × 81.6 = 71
Blizzak LM001: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 28.5 = 54
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 57 | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 49 |
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 57.1 + 40% × 74.6 = 64
Blizzak LM001: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 82 | 54 |
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 2 tests | 76 | 71 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 95% | 93% |
| Category | Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 59 |
| Dry | 76 | 60 |
| Wet | 83 | 65 |
| Snow | 65 | 60 |
| Comfort | 74 | 51 |
| Noise | 71 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 82 | 54 |
| Efficiency | 76 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Winter Sottozero 3
Blizzak LM001
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 finished ahead 3 times and Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Winter Sottozero 3 | Blizzak LM001 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% | 98% | +1.6 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 99% | −0.1 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% | 95% | +2.6 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 94% | 94% | +0.3 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% | 97% | +0.8 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 94% | 94% | −0.3 | 0–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 97% | 98% | −1.1 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Noise | Noise | 98% | 98% | −0.1 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 95% | 93% | +2.6 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 51% | 61% | −9.8 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/10 | #6/10 | – | 3–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 98 | 69 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | 14″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 40 | 40 |
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Winner: Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 82 vs 54 on handling.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 74 vs 51 on comfort.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 83 vs 65 on wet.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 71 vs 54 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 83 vs 65 on our wet score.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 76 vs 60 on our dry score.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 71 vs 54 on our noise score.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 74 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 64 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 76 vs 71 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology