Head-to-head Updated

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 10 + 2 road tests and 68 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Winter Sottozero 3 is ahead, 73–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
± 6

Tests 67 · 10 tests Owners 80 · 68 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test (dry braking)

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001

Blizzak LM001

Winter

± 7

Tests 71 · 2 tests Owners 46 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Winter Sottozero 3 +16
    60
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Sottozero 3Blizzak LM001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 2 tests7371
    Reviews found online8242
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1100%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–199%99%

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 81.7 = 76

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 42 = 60

  2. 83

    Wet

    Winter Sottozero 3 +18
    65
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Sottozero 3Blizzak LM001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 2 tests8075
    Reviews found online8750
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–197%95%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–194%94%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–198%97%

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 80.4 + 40% × 86.5 = 83

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 74.5 + 40% × 50.3 = 65

  3. 65

    Snow

    Winter Sottozero 3 +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Sottozero 3Blizzak LM001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 2 tests5668
    Reviews found online7948
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–194%94%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–197%98%

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 56.5 + 40% × 78.8 = 65

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 68.5 + 40% × 48 = 60

  4. 74

    Comfort

    Winter Sottozero 3 +23
    51
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Sottozero 3Blizzak LM001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7543

    Winter Sottozero 3: 40% × 72.1 + 60% × 74.5 = 74

    Blizzak LM001: 40% × 63.4 (est.) + 60% × 42.6 = 51

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    Winter Sottozero 3 +17
    54
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Sottozero 3Blizzak LM001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 2 tests6471
    Reviews found online8229
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–198%98%

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 64.4 + 40% × 81.6 = 71

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 28.5 = 54

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Winter Sottozero 3 +8
    56
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Sottozero 3Blizzak LM001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests57≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7549

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 57.1 + 40% × 74.6 = 64

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 82

    Handling (owners)

    Winter Sottozero 3 +28
    54
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Sottozero 3Blizzak LM001
    Reviews found online8254
  8. 76

    Efficiency

    Winter Sottozero 3 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Sottozero 3Blizzak LM001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 2 tests7671
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–195%93%
Scores at a glance
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM001: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryPirelli Winter Sottozero 3Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Relative Score 73 59
Dry 76 60
Wet 83 65
Snow 65 60
Comfort 74 51
Noise 71 54
Treadwear 64 56
Handling (owners) 82 54
Efficiency 76 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Winter Sottozero 3

± 7

Blizzak LM001

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 finished ahead 3 times and Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryWinter Sottozero 3Blizzak LM001ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% 98% +1.6 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% −0.1 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 95% +2.6 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Wet Braking Wet 94% 94% +0.3 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Wet Handling Wet 98% 97% +0.8 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Snow Braking Snow 94% 94% −0.3 0–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Snow Handling Snow 97% 98% −1.1 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Noise Noise 98% 98% −0.1 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 95% 93% +2.6 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 51% 61% −9.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Overall Ranking Overall #7/10 #6/10 – 3–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test · 195/65 R15

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winter Sottozero 3

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and resistance to hydroplaning.
  • Strong dry-road handling and steering precision for a winter tire.
  • Excellent traction and stability in snow and slush.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, particularly if driven in temperatures above 15°C or year-round.
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage and bubbling when encountering road hazards.
  • Increased noise levels as the tire ages and tread depth decreases.
All owner themes in the Winter Sottozero 3 review

Tire B Blizzak LM001

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and icy conditions
  • Precise handling and stability on cold, winter-affected roads
  • Reliable braking performance in severe weather

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
  • High noise levels on dry asphalt
  • Increased fuel consumption compared to other winter tires
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM001 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available9869
Rim diameters16″ – 21″14″ – 21″
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi
Sizes in common4040

Which one should you actually buy?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001

Winner: Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 82 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 74 vs 51 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 83 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 71 vs 54 on noise.

Tire A · Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Winter Sottozero 3 or Blizzak LM001?

Which is better in the wet, Winter Sottozero 3 or Blizzak LM001?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 83 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Winter Sottozero 3 or Blizzak LM001?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 76 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Winter Sottozero 3 or Blizzak LM001?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Winter Sottozero 3 or Blizzak LM001?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 71 vs 54 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Winter Sottozero 3 or Blizzak LM001?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 74 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Winter Sottozero 3 or Blizzak LM001?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 64 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Winter Sottozero 3 or Blizzak LM001?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 76 vs 71 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology