Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin X Ice Snow — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 32 + 13 road tests and 117 + 20 owner reviews. How we score

X Ice Snow leads, 73–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Blizzak LM005

Winter

± 4

Tests 73 · 32 tests Owners 58 · 117 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 54 in 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test (wet braking)

Michelin X Ice Snow
Tire BMichelin

X Ice Snow

Winter

± 5

Tests 70 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (comfort (tester's mark))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Blizzak LM005 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / 11 tests7765
    Reviews found online5571

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 55 = 68

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 70.7 = 67

  2. 88

    Wet

    Blizzak LM005 +17
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 32 / 12 tests10065
    Reviews found online7179

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 100 + 40% × 71 = 88

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 79.2 = 71

  3. 73

    Snow

    X Ice Snow +3
    76
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 32 / 12 tests7973
    Reviews found online6481

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 64.1 = 73

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 81.1 = 76

  4. 66

    Comfort

    X Ice Snow +14
    80
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests7781
    Reviews found online5879

    Blizzak LM005: 40% × 77.1 + 60% × 58.4 = 66

    X Ice Snow: 40% × 81 + 60% × 78.8 = 80

  5. 68

    Noise

    X Ice Snow +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / 8 tests6981
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 68.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 68

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak LM005 or X Ice Snow. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 38

    Treadwear

    X Ice Snow +38
    76
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests37≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online4181

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 36.5 + 40% × 41 = 38

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.4 = 76

    No road tests of treadwear for X Ice Snow. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 59

    Handling (owners)

    X Ice Snow +16
    75
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005X Ice Snow
    Reviews found online5975
  8. 83

    Efficiency

    Blizzak LM005 +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / 6 tests8377
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin X Ice Snow: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM005Michelin X Ice Snow
Relative Score 69 73
Dry 68 67
Wet 88 71
Snow 73 76
Comfort 66 80
Noise 68 75
Treadwear 38 76
Handling (owners) 59 75
Efficiency 83 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Blizzak LM005

± 5

X Ice Snow

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 finished ahead 1 times and Michelin X Ice Snow 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM005X Ice SnowΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/16 #9/16 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Teknikens Värld Big Winter Tire Test R17 · 225/50R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM005

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and braking performance on wet roads and heavy rain
  • High driving comfort with low interior noise levels when new
  • Predictable and stable handling characteristics in dry and mild winter conditions

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, with many users reporting the tire wearing out within 5,000 to 15,000 km
  • Noticeable degradation in snow and ice grip by the second or third season
  • Increased tire noise, whining, or humming vibrations as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM005 review

Tire B X Ice Snow

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow, packed snow, and slush
  • High confidence and predictable handling on icy and freezing roads
  • Impressive tread wear longevity and minimal wear over multiple seasons

Cons

  • Average performance on dry and wet pavement compared to dedicated non-winter tires
  • Slightly noisier on dry pavement as the tread wears down
  • Can feel slightly twitchy at the limit or less comfortable than older X-Ice generations
All owner themes in the X Ice Snow review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 B · Michelin X Ice Snow
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available165100
Rim diameters14″ – 22″13″ – 21″
Tread depth9/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common7878

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Michelin X Ice Snow

Narrow edge: Michelin X Ice Snow — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 if wet and efficiency matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 76 vs 38 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 88 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 75 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 80 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Tire B · Michelin X Ice Snow

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM005 or X Ice Snow?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM005 or X Ice Snow?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 88 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM005 or X Ice Snow?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM005 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 76 vs 73 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM005 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 75 vs 68 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM005 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 80 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM005 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 76 vs 38 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Blizzak LM005 or X Ice Snow?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 83 vs 77 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology