Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Yokohama Advan Winter V907 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 32 + 0 road tests and 116 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Advan Winter V907 is ahead, 79–70

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Blizzak LM005

Winter

± 4

Tests 73 · 32 tests Owners 59 · 116 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 54 in 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Advan Winter V907 +9
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005Advan Winter V907
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / – tests77≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online5683

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 56.3 = 69

    Advan Winter V907: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 78

    No road tests of dry for Advan Winter V907. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 89

    Wet

    Blizzak LM005 +5
    84
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005Advan Winter V907
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 32 / – tests100≈ 81 (est.)
    Reviews found online7289

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 100 + 40% × 71.6 = 89

    Advan Winter V907: 60% × 80.6 (est.) + 40% × 88.9 = 84

    No road tests of wet for Advan Winter V907. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 73

    Snow

    Advan Winter V907 +3
    76
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005Advan Winter V907
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 32 / – tests79≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online6580

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 79.3 + 40% × 64.7 = 73

    Advan Winter V907: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 80.4 = 76

    No road tests of snow for Advan Winter V907. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Advan Winter V907 +11
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005Advan Winter V907
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests78≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5982

    Blizzak LM005: 40% × 77.7 + 60% × 59.4 = 67

    Advan Winter V907: 40% × 71.5 (est.) + 60% × 82 = 78

    No road tests of comfort for Advan Winter V907. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005Advan Winter V907
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / – tests69–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 68.6 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 68

    No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak LM005. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 38

    Treadwear

    Advan Winter V907 +37
    75
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005Advan Winter V907
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests37≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online4181

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 36.7 + 40% × 41.1 = 38

    Advan Winter V907: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 80.8 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Winter V907. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 60

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Winter V907 +23
    83
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005Advan Winter V907
    Reviews found online6083
  8. 83

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005Advan Winter V907
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / – tests83–
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Yokohama Advan Winter V907: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM005Yokohama Advan Winter V907
Relative Score 70 79
Dry 69 78
Wet 89 84
Snow 73 76
Comfort 67 78
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 38 75
Handling (owners) 60 83
Efficiency 83 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Blizzak LM005

± 8

Advan Winter V907

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM005

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and braking performance on wet roads and heavy rain
  • High driving comfort with low interior noise levels when new
  • Predictable and stable handling characteristics in dry and mild winter conditions

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, with many users reporting the tire wearing out within 5,000 to 15,000 km
  • Noticeable degradation in snow and ice grip by the second or third season
  • Increased tire noise, whining, or humming vibrations as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM005 review

Tire B Advan Winter V907

Pros

  • Exceptional snow traction and winter performance
  • Strong dry-weather handling comparable to summer tires
  • High level of ride comfort

Cons

  • Noticeable sidewall flex during spirited driving
  • Uncertainty regarding long-term tread life
  • Potential for increased road noise compared to premium summer options
All owner themes in the Advan Winter V907 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 B · Yokohama Advan Winter V907
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available16544
Rim diameters14″ – 22″19″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common3636

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Yokohama Advan Winter V907

Winner: Yokohama Advan Winter V907 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 if wet matters most to you. Yokohama Advan Winter V907 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan Winter V907 scores 75 vs 38 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Winter V907 scores 83 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Winter V907 scores 78 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Winter V907 scores 78 vs 69 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Winter V907

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM005 or Advan Winter V907?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM005 or Advan Winter V907?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 89 vs 84 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM005 or Advan Winter V907?

Yokohama Advan Winter V907, 78 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM005 or Advan Winter V907?

Yokohama Advan Winter V907, 76 vs 73 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM005 or Advan Winter V907?

Yokohama Advan Winter V907, 78 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM005 or Advan Winter V907?

Yokohama Advan Winter V907, 75 vs 38 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology