Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 32 + 11 road tests and 117 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Blizzak LM005 66, BluEarth Winter V906 65.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Blizzak LM005

Winter

± 5

Tests 73 · 32 tests Owners 58 · 117 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 54 in 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test (wet braking)

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
± 6

Tests 65 · 11 tests Owners 66 · 3 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2025 AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test (comfort (tester's mark))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 5 tests that measured wet braking for both, Blizzak LM005 won 5 and BluEarth Winter V906 won 0 (average 99% vs 88% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured snow braking for both, Blizzak LM005 won 5 and BluEarth Winter V906 won 0 (average 97% vs 93% of the best).
  1. 68

    Dry

    BluEarth Winter V906 +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005BluEarth Winter V906
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / 5 tests7775
    Reviews found online5568
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–195%95%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–199%99%

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 55 = 68

    BluEarth Winter V906: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 67.9 = 72

  2. 88

    Wet

    Blizzak LM005 +11
    77
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005BluEarth Winter V906
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 32 / 11 tests10080
    Reviews found online7172
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%82%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–096%89%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–099%88%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%96%

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 100 + 40% × 71 = 88

    BluEarth Winter V906: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 72.2 = 77

  3. 73

    Snow

    Blizzak LM005 +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005BluEarth Winter V906
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 32 / 11 tests7961
    Reviews found online6468
    Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–188%92%
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–097%93%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%96%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–096%93%

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 64.1 = 73

    BluEarth Winter V906: 60% × 60.5 + 40% × 68.3 = 64

  4. 66

    Comfort

    BluEarth Winter V906 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005BluEarth Winter V906
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests7776
    Reviews found online5863

    Blizzak LM005: 40% × 77.1 + 60% × 58.4 = 66

    BluEarth Winter V906: 40% × 75.7 + 60% × 63.1 = 68

  5. 68

    Noise

    Blizzak LM005 +12
    56
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005BluEarth Winter V906
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / 4 tests6949
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–198%97%

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 68.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 68

    BluEarth Winter V906: 60% × 48.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 56

    No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak LM005 or BluEarth Winter V906. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 38

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Winter V906 +11
    49
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005BluEarth Winter V906
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 5 tests3745
    Reviews found online4156
    Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–157%67%
    Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–163%63%

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 36.5 + 40% × 41 = 38

    BluEarth Winter V906: 60% × 44.9 + 40% × 55.9 = 49

  7. 59

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Winter V906 +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005BluEarth Winter V906
    Reviews found online5969
  8. 83

    Efficiency

    Blizzak LM005 +53
    30
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM005BluEarth Winter V906
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / 4 tests8330
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–097%97%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–088%76%
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM005Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
Relative Score 66 65
Dry 68 72
Wet 88 77
Snow 73 64
Comfort 66 68
Noise 68 56
Treadwear 38 49
Handling (owners) 59 69
Efficiency 83 30

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Blizzak LM005

± 6

BluEarth Winter V906

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 8 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 finished ahead 6 times and Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 2 times.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM005BluEarth Winter V906ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% 95% +0.2 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% −0.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 97% 82% +15.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% 89% +6.5 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Braking Wet 99% 88% +10.4 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling Wet 100% 96% +4.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Ice Braking Snow 88% 92% −3.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Braking Snow 97% 93% +3.8 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Handling Snow 99% 96% +3.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Traction Snow 96% 93% +3.1 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Noise Noise 98% 97% +0.6 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Abrasion Treadwear 57% 67% −9.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wear Treadwear 63% 63% −0.2 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 97% 97% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 88% 76% +12.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 74% 88% −14.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #12/20 #20/20 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Value Cost 51% 62% −10.8 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #15/15 #13/15 – 6–2 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM005

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and braking performance on wet roads and heavy rain
  • High driving comfort with low interior noise levels when new
  • Predictable and stable handling characteristics in dry and mild winter conditions

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, with many users reporting the tire wearing out within 5,000 to 15,000 km
  • Noticeable degradation in snow and ice grip by the second or third season
  • Increased tire noise, whining, or humming vibrations as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM005 review

Tire B BluEarth Winter V906

Pros

  • Excellent grip and confidence on cold, frosty, and wet roads
  • Solid performance in light snow and alpine conditions
  • Quiet and compliant ride quality without feeling soggy

Cons

  • Wear rate is only average at best
  • Limited feedback on deep snow testing from some users
All owner themes in the BluEarth Winter V906 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 B · Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available16554
Rim diameters14″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″11/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi
Sizes in common4747

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906

Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 and Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is stronger on efficiency, noise and wet. Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 is stronger on treadwear, handling and dry.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 83 vs 30 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 68 vs 56 on noise.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 88 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 scores 49 vs 38 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM005 or BluEarth Winter V906?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM005 or BluEarth Winter V906?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 88 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM005 or BluEarth Winter V906?

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906, 72 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM005 or BluEarth Winter V906?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 73 vs 64 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM005 or BluEarth Winter V906?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 68 vs 56 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM005 or BluEarth Winter V906?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM005 or BluEarth Winter V906?

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906, 49 vs 38 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Blizzak LM005 or BluEarth Winter V906?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 83 vs 30 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology