Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 3 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Winter i cept evo3 is ahead, 77–71
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 16 tests Owners 74 · 22 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Winter i cept evo3 +475Why this score
Source Blizzak LM35 Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online 73 73 -
75
Wet
Winter i cept evo3 +1186Why this score
Source Blizzak LM35 Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 91 Reviews found online 76 78 -
–
Snow
No comparison78Why this score
Source Blizzak LM35 Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 80 Reviews found online – 75 -
69
Comfort
Blizzak LM35 +168Why this score
Source Blizzak LM35 Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 70 64 -
–
Noise
No comparison33Why this score
Source Blizzak LM35 Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 10 -
68
Treadwear
Winter i cept evo3 +674Why this score
Source Blizzak LM35 Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online 69 73 -
72
Handling
Level72Why this score
Source Blizzak LM35 Winter i cept evo3 Reviews found online 72 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 | Hankook Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 77 |
| Dry | 71 | 75 |
| Wet | 75 | 86 |
| Snow | – | 78 |
| Comfort | 69 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 33 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 74 |
| Handling | 72 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Blizzak LM35
Winter i cept evo3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak LM35
Pros
- Exceptional grip and handling in wet road conditions
- Strong performance and stability on snow-covered surfaces
- High level of ride comfort
Cons
- Performance on pure ice is adequate but not class-leading
- Snow performance is rated as good rather than exceptional compared to dedicated deep-snow tires
Tire B Winter i cept evo3
Pros
- Exceptional wet grip and outstanding aquaplaning resistance
- Outstanding snow and ice traction providing high confidence in winter storms
- Great value for money compared to Tier-1 brands like Michelin or Goodyear
Cons
- Slightly increased noise levels or humming compared to summer tires
- Mixed feedback on ride comfort, with some finding them stiffer
- Longer braking distances reported by a few users in specific conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 | B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter High Performance tires | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 86 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 86 vs 75 on wet.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 74 vs 68 on treadwear.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 75 vs 71 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.