Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 6 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak WS70 vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 6 + 1,068 owner reviews. How we score
Agilis CrossClimate leads, 78–74 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 86 · 1,068 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Agilis CrossClimate +578Why this score
Source Blizzak WS70 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 76 88 Blizzak WS70: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 73
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 87.6 = 78
No road tests of dry for Blizzak WS70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
76
Wet
Agilis CrossClimate +278Why this score
Source Blizzak WS70 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 78 88 Blizzak WS70: 60% × 74.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 76
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 88.1 = 78
No road tests of wet for Blizzak WS70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
77
Snow
Agilis CrossClimate +178Why this score
Source Blizzak WS70 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 81 82 Blizzak WS70: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 77
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 75 + 40% × 82.1 = 78
No road tests of snow for Blizzak WS70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
74
Comfort
Agilis CrossClimate +478Why this score
Source Blizzak WS70 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 77 82 Blizzak WS70: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 77.1 = 74
Agilis CrossClimate: 40% × 71.5 (est.) + 60% × 81.8 = 78
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak WS70 or Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Blizzak WS70 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 73 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 73 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for Agilis CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
Agilis CrossClimate +678Why this score
Source Blizzak WS70 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 75 85 Blizzak WS70: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Agilis CrossClimate +1381Why this score
Source Blizzak WS70 Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online 68 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison69Why this score
Source Blizzak WS70 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak WS70 | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 78 |
| Dry | 73 | 78 |
| Wet | 76 | 78 |
| Snow | 77 | 78 |
| Comfort | 74 | 78 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak WS70
Agilis CrossClimate
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak WS70
Pros
- Phenomenal grip and traction on snow, ice, and slush
- Impressively quiet operation for a winter tire
- Excellent confidence in harsh, Nordic-style winter climates
Cons
- Reduced stability and handling precision on dry pavement at highway speeds
- Squishy or vague steering feel in wet conditions
- Occasional difficulty with take-off traction on rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Tire B Agilis CrossClimate
Pros
- Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling
Cons
- Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
- Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
- A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Blizzak WS70
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.
“I fitted these to our 680 Michelin Agilis Crossclimate 235/60 R17C 117/115R 8PR, 3PMSF And they work well, better off tarmac (Grassy muddy farm track) than the factory tyres and felt better in heavy rain. I can’t recall if ride quality changed tho.”
“Costco tire employee here- It can be hard to estimate tire life w/out warranty info. Most members see about 60k miles on the agilis crossclimate and 75k on the defender ltx. The agilis is the better tire for heavy loading but you have to balance that against how fast you'll wear them out. Both are great tires though”
“I bought a set of Agilis for my 2017 F250 King Ranch two years ago. I live in Colorado and I was attracted to the idea that they could possibly be left on year round and not have to swap between summer and winter tires. I have swapped between summer and winter tires for the past 25 years here in Colorado and I have tried tires that were supposedly "ALL SEASON" but they were always a compromise, not great in the summer and as a highway tire and not great in the winter as a snow or ice tire. The Agilis has been the only tire that has great summer performance, quiet and nice handling and also it has been hard to believe, but they act pretty close to Blizzaks I've had in the past for winter driving. I have 25,000 miles on them and they are wearing very well, and have not become noisy. I'm surprised there are not more accolades on these tires. They came out on top vs several other all season tires.”
Based on 54 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS70 | B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Van |
| Sizes available | — | 22 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 17″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS70
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Narrow edge: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Blizzak WS70 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 81 vs 68 on handling.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 72 on treadwear.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 73 on dry.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 74 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak WS70 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak WS70 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak WS70 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 73 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak WS70 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 78 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak WS70 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 74 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak WS70 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology