Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 45 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 45 + 1,073 owner reviews. How we score
Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 78–69
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 3 tests Owners 85 · 1,073 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Agilis CrossClimate +1379Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 64 87 Blizzak WS80: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 87.1 = 79
No road tests of dry for Blizzak WS80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
Agilis CrossClimate +678Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 73 88 Blizzak WS80: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 72
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 87.8 = 78
No road tests of wet for Blizzak WS80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
77
Snow
Agilis CrossClimate +178Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 82 82 Blizzak WS80: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 81.7 = 78
No road tests of snow for Blizzak WS80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
68
Comfort
Agilis CrossClimate +270Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 55 Reviews found online 68 81 Blizzak WS80: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 68.2 = 68
Agilis CrossClimate: 40% × 54.7 + 60% × 81 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak WS80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
65
Noise
Agilis CrossClimate +1075Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 64 ≈ 66 (est.) Blizzak WS80: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 75
No road tests of noise for Blizzak WS80. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Agilis CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
67
Treadwear
Agilis CrossClimate +1178Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 67 85 Blizzak WS80: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Agilis CrossClimate +1381Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online 68 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 78 |
| Dry | 66 | 79 |
| Wet | 72 | 78 |
| Snow | 77 | 78 |
| Comfort | 68 | 70 |
| Noise | 65 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Blizzak WS80
78
/ 100
Agilis CrossClimate
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak WS80 | Agilis CrossClimate | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/9 2018 Autofil Studless Winter Tire Test R16 | #2/6 promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak WS80
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow, slush, and ice
- High confidence and safety during severe winter weather and mountain driving
- Surprisingly low road noise on dry and wet pavement
Cons
- Reduced fuel economy / lower gas mileage
- Slightly squishy handling and reduced braking performance on dry roads
- May feel less responsive than standard all-season or newer model compounds in non-winter conditions
Tire B Agilis CrossClimate
Pros
- Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling
Cons
- Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
- Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
- A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Blizzak WS80
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.
r/Finland
·2024-10-16
“Lapland - Tyre Advice - Michelin Agilis Crossclimate Grateful for the knowledge/experience of the good people of r/Finland . I ordinarily use studded tyres for my van, but planning a roadtrip down to Germany/France over the new year (so can't fit these). I've no experience with friction tyres on snow/ice, but have Michelin Agilis Crossclimate [ . These have the 3PMSF marking so I understand are technically legal in Finland for winter, but I'm not sure about safety/performance in Lapland (route being: Tornio, to Sweden and then down via Denmark.) Good to hear people's views, or if you've experience with these types of tyres in this environment? UPDATE: Really appreciate the comments and views put forward on this. By the debate it seems I’m not alone in being not clear about winter performance of a tyre rated 3PMSF but not a “true” Nordic friction tyre. It does not make economic sense to buy new winter friction tyres for a road trip. So thinking about packing the Michelins, driving the studded tyre and getting them swapped/stored in Denmark or South Sweden and then swapping back on return. A pain in ass, a waste of space but the least risky approach. If anyone’s done similar let me know your experience.”
r/BoltEV
·5 upvotes ·2025-10-19
“Anyone tried Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tires on a Bolt? Following the info from I have picked up some used 15" Sonic wheels for winter use here in Maine. I can get Michelin Ice snow tires in an equivalent 15" size (to match the circumference of the stock tire/wheel) but not Cross Climate 2s. However, this Agilis is available in a near equivalent. It appears to be a heavier tire designed primarily for delivery vans Google AI suggests it has a slightly higher rolling resistance to the CC2s, which many report to have about a 10% hit on range - although any new tire will be less efficient than a well-worn one, so we should take that info with a grain of salt The Michelin Energy Saver tires are obviously more efficient, but also rated poor for use in snow. I'm a bit torn between "proper" snow tires and the Agilis, which I could run all year round One other factor is that smaller wheels tend to be more efficient - to a noticeable extent on EVs, so it just might be a wash as far as efficiency goes Read more”
r/Cartalk
·1 upvote ·2025-04-09
“Agilis Crossclimate vs Agilis LTX as a summer tire for a pickup? Daily driver Chevy 3/4 ton pickup. I've got a set of winter tires that I run from Nov-Mar but I need to replace my summer tires. Mediterranean climate, so dry summers. 99% of my driving is city/highway, maybe 1-5 days per year on dry dirt roads. I'd like to go with the crossclimate since they're about $200 cheaper for the set. I guess the Defender LTX just got rebranded Agilis LTX. I know the Defender LTX is a very popular light truck tire. Y'all think I can get away with the crossclimate and save a couple hundred bucks? Read more”
Top themes
#Heavy load capability#Winter and snow traction#Tread wear longevity#Defender LTX comparison#C-metric recall notice#Ride comfort and noise#Van and RV use
Based on 54 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 | B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Van |
| Sizes available | 21 | 22 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Bridgestone Blizzak WS80
78
/ 100
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better dry, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 79 vs 66 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 81 vs 68 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 67 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 75 vs 65 on noise.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS80
Tire B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak WS80 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak WS80 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak WS80 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 79 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak WS80 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 78 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Blizzak WS80 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 75 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak WS80 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak WS80 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology