Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 56 reviews
Toyo Proxes TQ looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza vs Toyo Proxes TQ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 56 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Dueler H/L Alenza is ahead, 69–43
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Dueler H/L Alenza +1157Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Proxes TQ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 68 51 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68
Proxes TQ: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
Dueler H/L Alenza +4032Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Proxes TQ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 41 (est.) Reviews found online 73 17 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72
Proxes TQ: 60% × 41.4 (est.) + 40% × 17 = 32
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Dueler H/L Alenza +3135Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Proxes TQ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 51 (est.) Reviews found online 64 10 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 66
Proxes TQ: 60% × 51.3 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 35
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
68
Comfort
Dueler H/L Alenza +1553Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Proxes TQ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 68 45 Dueler H/L Alenza: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 68 = 68
Proxes TQ: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 45 = 53
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
Dueler H/L Alenza +861Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Proxes TQ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 72 52 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 69
Proxes TQ: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 61
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/L Alenza or Proxes TQ. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Dueler H/L Alenza +3432Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Proxes TQ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 46 (est.) Reviews found online 65 10 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
Proxes TQ: 60% × 46.1 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 32
No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison43Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Proxes TQ Reviews found online – 43
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza | Toyo Proxes TQ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 43 |
| Dry | 68 | 57 |
| Wet | 72 | 32 |
| Snow | 66 | 35 |
| Comfort | 68 | 53 |
| Noise | 69 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 32 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 43 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dueler H/L Alenza
Proxes TQ
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dueler H/L Alenza
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Proxes TQ
Pros
- Exceptional straight-line traction and launch capability for high-horsepower applications
- Competitive pricing compared to other drag radial alternatives
- Surprisingly quiet operation during normal street driving
Cons
- Dangerous handling characteristics in heavy rain or standing water
- Noticeable sidewall flex during aggressive cornering or rapid steering inputs
- Requires proper heat cycling/warming to achieve maximum performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza | B · Toyo Proxes TQ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 22″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 6 - 7/32″ |
| UTQG | 260 A A | B B |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza
Toyo Proxes TQ
Winner: Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza — better wet, treadwear and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes TQ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 72 vs 32 on wet.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 66 vs 32 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 66 vs 35 on snow.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 68 vs 53 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dueler H/L Alenza or Proxes TQ?
Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/L Alenza or Proxes TQ?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 72 vs 32 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/L Alenza or Proxes TQ?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 68 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dueler H/L Alenza or Proxes TQ?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 66 vs 35 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Dueler H/L Alenza or Proxes TQ?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 69 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/L Alenza or Proxes TQ?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 68 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dueler H/L Alenza or Proxes TQ?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 66 vs 32 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology