Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 56 reviews
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 56 + 35 owner reviews. How we score
Dueler H/L Alenza leads, 69–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 35 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Geolandar H/T G056 +371Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 68 73 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
Dueler H/L Alenza +270Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 73 70 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Dueler H/L Alenza +858Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 64 50 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 66
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
68
Comfort
Geolandar H/T G056 +169Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 68 69 Dueler H/L Alenza: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 68 = 68
Geolandar H/T G056: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
Dueler H/L Alenza +168Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 72 72 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 69
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 68
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/L Alenza or Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Dueler H/L Alenza +264Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 65 63 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison68Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online – 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 67 |
| Dry | 68 | 71 |
| Wet | 72 | 70 |
| Snow | 66 | 58 |
| Comfort | 68 | 69 |
| Noise | 69 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dueler H/L Alenza
Geolandar H/T G056
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dueler H/L Alenza
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Geolandar H/T G056
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry pavement handling and stability
- Impressive tread longevity for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
- Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
- Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza | B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 4 | 56 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 260 A A | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza — better snow. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 if dry matters most to you.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 66 vs 58 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 71 vs 68 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dueler H/L Alenza or Geolandar H/T G056?
Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/L Alenza or Geolandar H/T G056?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/L Alenza or Geolandar H/T G056?
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 71 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dueler H/L Alenza or Geolandar H/T G056?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 66 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Dueler H/L Alenza or Geolandar H/T G056?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/L Alenza or Geolandar H/T G056?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Dueler H/L Alenza or Geolandar H/T G056?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology