Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 35 reviews
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 35 + 164 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar H/T G056 leads, 67–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 55 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 164 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test (dry circle)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Geolandar H/T G056 +665Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 73 76 Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71
Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.2 + 40% × 75.9 = 65
No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
Geolandar H/T G056 +367Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 60 Reviews found online 70 78 Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70
Crugen HT51: 60% × 59.5 + 40% × 78 = 67
No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
58
Snow
Geolandar H/T G056 +949Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 36 Reviews found online 50 70 Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 58
Crugen HT51: 60% × 35.9 + 40% × 69.6 = 49
No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
68
Comfort
Crugen HT51 +270Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 68 70 Geolandar H/T G056: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 68.4 = 68
Crugen HT51: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.3 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
Crugen HT51 +371Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 72 79 Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 68
Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 71
No road tests of noise for Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Crugen HT51 +266Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 63 76 Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 76.4 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Crugen HT51 +674Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 Crugen HT51 Reviews found online 68 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 | Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 65 |
| Dry | 71 | 65 |
| Wet | 70 | 67 |
| Snow | 58 | 49 |
| Comfort | 68 | 70 |
| Noise | 68 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Geolandar H/T G056
Crugen HT51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Geolandar H/T G056
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry pavement handling and stability
- Impressive tread longevity for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
- Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
- Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
Tire B Crugen HT51
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
- Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction
Cons
- Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
- Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
- Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 | B · Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 56 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 12.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 720 A A | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 32 | 32 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Kumho Crugen HT51
Narrow edge: Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — better snow, dry and wet. Pick the Kumho Crugen HT51 if handling and noise matter most to you.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 58 vs 49 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 71 vs 65 on dry.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 68 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 70 vs 67 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?
Which is better in the wet, Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 70 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 71 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 58 vs 49 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 71 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology