tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 35 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 leads, 72–68 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HT51 or Geolandar H/T G056 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire BKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 8

Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7477

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 72

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +6
    76
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online7079

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 70

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 76

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    Crugen HT51 +12
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5070

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 58

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6971

    Geolandar H/T G056: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.3 = 69

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    Crugen HT51 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7280

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 69

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Crugen HT51 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)58
    Reviews found online6376

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 64

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +5
    74
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Crugen HT51
    Reviews found online6974
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama Geolandar H/T G056Kumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 68 72
Dry 72 74
Wet 70 76
Snow 58 70
Comfort 69 70
Noise 69 72
Treadwear 64 65
Handling (owners) 69 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Geolandar H/T G056

± 8

Crugen HT51

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Geolandar H/T G056

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry pavement handling and stability
  • Impressive tread longevity for many users

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
  • Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
  • Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Geolandar H/T G056 review

Tire B Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 B · Kumho Crugen HT51
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available5644
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Tread depth11/32″12.5/32″
UTQG720 A A720 A A
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi
Sizes in common3232

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056

Kumho Crugen HT51

Narrow edge: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better snow, wet and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 58 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 76 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 72 vs 69 on noise.

Tire A · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?

Which is better in the wet, Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 76 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 69 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Geolandar H/T G056 or Crugen HT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology