tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 277 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 is ahead, 65–47

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HT51 or Crugen HP71 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire AKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 277 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire BKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 8

Tests 55 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test (dry circle)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 44

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +21
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 53 (est.)58
    Reviews found online3176

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.5 = 44

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.2 + 40% × 75.8 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 51

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +16
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 56 (est.)60
    Reviews found online4478

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.1 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 51

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 59.5 + 40% × 78 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Crugen HP71 +4
    49
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 61 (est.)36
    Reviews found online4170

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 53

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 35.9 + 40% × 69.6 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 44

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +26
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online3270

    Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.4 (est.) + 60% × 31.9 = 44

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.3 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 54

    Noise

    Crugen HT51 +17
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online3679

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 54

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 71

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 37

    Treadwear

    Crugen HT51 +29
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 49 (est.)58
    Reviews found online1976

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.2 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 76.4 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +23
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HT51
    Reviews found online5174
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HP71Kumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 47 65
Dry 44 65
Wet 51 67
Snow 53 49
Comfort 44 70
Noise 54 71
Treadwear 37 66
Handling (owners) 51 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HP71

± 8

Crugen HT51

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrugen HP71Crugen HT51ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 #9/30 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

Tire B Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.

r/TeslaModelY ·4 upvotes ·2026-06-17

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
r/volvoc40 ·61 upvotes ·2026-07-08

“Yet Another C40 Wheel Downsize Report I decided to join the crowd in downsizing from the factory 20" wheels to 18" Wheels: Voxx Paso Tires: Kumho Crugen EV HP71 (currently on sale for $500 for a set of 4) I was a bit worried about wheel fitment because of the large brake calipers, but they fit without issue, standard install. I've only put about 100 miles on them so far, but the ride is much more comfortable and these new tires are SO much quieter than the old tires that were installed when I bought the vehicle (CPO): Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 I don't have enough data yet to see if this will make a range improvement, but I imagine it will as they're skinnier tires and EV optimized. So far I'm impressed with the Kumho's, especially for the price they're offering. And I think these new wheels look pretty decent! Read more”
r/Ioniq5 ·1 upvote ·2026-08-30

“The HP71 are actually the OE tire for several trim/MY combinations for the Ioniq 5 and EV6 and they're decent tires. The longest lasting tire is the Defender 2, with the trade off of mediocre traction. I run the Nokian One because it's a batter balance of traction and tread wear than the defender but still quiet and very long-lasting.”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues

Based on 52 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Crugen HT51

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP71 B · Kumho Crugen HT51
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available6344
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Tread depth9.9/32″12.5/32″
UTQG640 A A720 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi
Sizes in common1717

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HP71

Kumho Crugen HT51

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP71 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 66 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 44 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 65 vs 44 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HP71 or Crugen HT51?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 67 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 65 vs 44 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HP71 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HP71, 53 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 71 vs 54 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 44 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 66 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology