tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Nexen N Priz RH7 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 277 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

N Priz RH7 leads, 49–47 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · N Priz RH7 or Crugen HP71 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire AKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 277 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Nexen N Priz RH7
Tire BNexen

N Priz RH7

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 44

    Dry

    N Priz RH7 +6
    50
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71N Priz RH7
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online3141

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.6 (est.) + 40% × 30.6 = 44

    N Priz RH7: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 40.5 = 50

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 51

    Wet

    Level
    51
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71N Priz RH7
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online4444

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.1 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 51

    N Priz RH7: 60% × 56.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.1 = 51

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Crugen HP71 +8
    45
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71N Priz RH7
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online4128

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 53

    N Priz RH7: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 27.6 = 45

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 44

    Comfort

    N Priz RH7 +7
    51
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71N Priz RH7
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online3243

    Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.4 (est.) + 60% × 32.2 = 44

    N Priz RH7: 40% × 63.4 (est.) + 60% × 42.5 = 51

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 54

    Noise

    N Priz RH7 +5
    59
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71N Priz RH7
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online3649

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 35.8 = 54

    N Priz RH7: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.7 = 59

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or N Priz RH7. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 37

    Treadwear

    N Priz RH7 +9
    46
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71N Priz RH7
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 49 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online1934

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.6 = 37

    N Priz RH7: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 33.7 = 46

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HP71 +12
    39
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71N Priz RH7
    Reviews found online5139
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HP71Nexen N Priz RH7
Relative Score 47 49
Dry 44 50
Wet 51 51
Snow 53 45
Comfort 44 51
Noise 54 59
Treadwear 37 46
Handling (owners) 51 39

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HP71

± 8

N Priz RH7

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

Tire B N Priz RH7

Pros

  • Affordable value-priced option compared to premium brands
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Positive wet traction and handling reported by some users

Cons

  • Significant loss of grip and slippery behavior in wet conditions, leading to spin-outs or hydroplaning concerns
  • Poor performance in light snow and ice, particularly for rear-wheel-drive or 2WD vehicles
  • Some reports of premature structural degradation, such as the tire tearing apart after a few years
All owner themes in the N Priz RH7 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.

r/TeslaModelY ·4 upvotes ·2026-06-17

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
r/VolvoRecharge ·1 upvote ·2026-10-05

“Kumho Crugen HP71 235/50R19XL 103V BSW ($132.44/each) Total: $264.88 Kumho Crugen EV HP71 255/45R19XL 104V BSW ($287.70/each Gigatires about a month ago I feel like they're just as good as the Continentals that came with the car It's crazy that these EVS have different size tires front and rear, prevents rotating tires for even wear. It's also surprising that the cost difference from the front the rear was so much different. It was also like that with numerous other manufacturers. I also drive about 24,000 mi a year, so we'll see if they hold up.”
r/Cadillac ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-28

“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues

Based on 52 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N Priz RH7

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP71 B · Nexen N Priz RH7
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available6312
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 20″
Tread depth9.9/32″10/32″
UTQG640 A A540 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi
Sizes in common99

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HP71

Nexen N Priz RH7

Narrow edge: Nexen N Priz RH7 — better treadwear, comfort and dry. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP71 if handling and snow matter most to you. Nexen N Priz RH7 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 51 vs 39 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Priz RH7 scores 46 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 53 vs 45 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Priz RH7 scores 51 vs 44 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Priz RH7
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HP71 or N Priz RH7?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or N Priz RH7?

Neither, by our numbers: 51 vs 51 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or N Priz RH7?

Nexen N Priz RH7, 50 vs 44 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HP71 or N Priz RH7?

Kumho Crugen HP71, 53 vs 45 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or N Priz RH7?

Nexen N Priz RH7, 59 vs 54 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or N Priz RH7?

Nexen N Priz RH7, 51 vs 44 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or N Priz RH7?

Nexen N Priz RH7, 46 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology