Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 278 + 2,532 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 75–46
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,532 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Aim for rainy condition. Best are 1.Bridgestone Turanza 005 2.Hankook ventus prime 4.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
44
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +3579Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 52 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 31 73 Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.7 = 44
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73.2 = 79
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
51
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +2677Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 44 75 Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 51
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.6 = 77
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) – Reviews found online 41 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 53
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
44
Comfort
Ventus Prime 4 +2569Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 32 67 Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32.1 = 44
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.4 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
54
Noise
Ventus Prime 4 +761Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 36 ≈ 66 (est.) Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 54
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 61
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
37
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +3774Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 49 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 18 67 Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.4 = 37
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
51
Handling (owners)
Ventus Prime 4 +2172Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 51 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison84Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 84
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 46 | 75 |
| Dry | 44 | 79 |
| Wet | 51 | 77 |
| Snow | 53 | – |
| Comfort | 44 | 69 |
| Noise | 54 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
46
/ 100
Crugen HP71
75
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Crugen HP71 | Ventus Prime 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | #11/16 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HP71
Pros
- Strong value: frequently described as much cheaper than Michelin, Pirelli or Bridgestone alternatives while not feeling like a budget tire.
- Good wet and heavy-rain traction, with some reports of confident light-snow performance.
- Quiet, smooth ride reported by many owners, often as an improvement over the stock tires (Bridgestone Dueler, Pirelli, Hankook).
Cons
- Premature or uneven tread wear is the most common complaint, with reports of tires worn out at roughly 15,000 to 27,000 miles or within 1.5 years, far below the 65,000-mile rating.
- Road and highway noise, including howling that develops with mileage, reported by several owners.
- Vibration and difficulty keeping the tires balanced, in some cases even after repeated balancing and rotations.
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
r/nissanpathfinder
·1 upvote ·2026-05-31
“2026 Pathfinder Tires: 255/60R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 vs 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra I think I settled on a configuration that suits our needs but it comes with the upgraded 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra tires/rims. The 20" wheels look great but I think the 18" Kumho's with the taller side will be better for the sometimes rough roads (potholes, large bumps, torn up city streets) we drive and for lighter towing. I highly doubt the dealer will exchange them for me but first I wanted to ask if I'm just overthinking this or should I try to trade down for the 18s. For reference I'm completely satisfied driving an outback with 225/60R18 Yokohama Avid GT (controlled, planted) and not happy with a highlander with 235/65R18 (too soft, uncontrolled). I get that these are different vehicles, suspensions, center of gravity, but hopefully it gives you a better idea. Thanks Edit: clarification on towing: fiberglass trailer like Scamp/Casita”
r/tires
·2026-10-14
“Kumho warranty I had these for a little under 18 months. The thread is still good, but the tires have these cracks. Do you guys think I can claim warranty from Kumho? These are Kumho Crugen HP71. Manufacturing date 01/24.”
r/AskAMechanic
·1 upvote ·2026-07-26
“I need a new tire, right? 215/55R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 tire showing cords on the outer sidewall. I need a new tire, right? Edit: I’m thinking about replacing just this one tire, 2023 CX-30 AWD. Tires were new Oct 2025 and have 7mm tread depth left. According to the spec sheet, this new tire would have 7.9mm of depth. Can I get away with one tire? Edit 2: Existing vs new tires would have ~1mm of difference in tread depth Read more”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues
Based on 52 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
forums.hardwarezone.com.sg
·2024-11-12
“Ya. I read that review too. If I up the psi to 3, or 4 would result in hard and harsh bumps and much less comfy ride which I don't like. Therefore, I settle for 34 front and 32 back and started back to use Eco mode. I don't carry heavy loads and many pax in my car. I restricted it to 4 adult pax including myself as a driver, with or without loads at the boot.”
r/tires
·3 upvotes ·2026-10-09
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4, covered less than 600miles. Found a small cut on the front right one. It is holding air fine. I will go to a tire shop to get checked asap, but chances that it’s ok? And what could have caused it? Hitting a curb? Thank you in advance!”
r/CartalkHungary
·2 upvotes ·2024-09-20
“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | 63 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 200 - 420 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 12 | 12 |
Which one should you actually buy?
46
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
75
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 79 vs 44 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 77 vs 51 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 69 vs 44 on comfort.
Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HP71 or Ventus Prime 4?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 77 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 79 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 61 vs 54 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 69 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology