Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Defender LTX M/S vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 10 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 78–71

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Tire AMichelin

Defender LTX M/S

All Season

± 7Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 82 · 10 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire BKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 9

Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 78

    Dry

    Defender LTX M/S +4
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8377

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.3 = 78

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 81

    Wet

    Defender LTX M/S +5
    76
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online8479

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 78.2 (est.) + 40% × 84.2 = 81

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 76

    No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 74

    Snow

    Defender LTX M/S +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7670

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 74

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Defender LTX M/S +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7871

    Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.6 = 75

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Defender LTX M/S or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–80

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 79

    Treadwear

    Defender LTX M/S +14
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7558
    Reviews found online8576
    Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–084%58%

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 85.1 = 79

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.4 = 65

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    Defender LTX M/S +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SCrugen HT51
    Reviews found online8074
Scores at a glance
Michelin Defender LTX M/S vs Kumho Crugen HT51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Defender LTX M/SKumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 78 71
Dry 78 74
Wet 81 76
Snow 74 70
Comfort 75 70
Noise – 72
Treadwear 79 65
Handling (owners) 80 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Defender LTX M/S

± 9

Crugen HT51

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Michelin Defender LTX M/S finished ahead 1 times and Kumho Crugen HT51 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryDefender LTX M/SCrugen HT51ΔHead-to-head
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Treadwear 84% 58% +26.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/13 #5/13 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Defender LTX M/S

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and mileage lifespan
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality at highway speeds
  • Strong year-round traction across dry, wet, and light snow conditions

Cons

  • High upfront purchase price
  • Subpar performance in deep mud, sand, and off-road environments
  • Limited ice and severe winter capability compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Defender LTX M/S review

Tire B Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S B · Kumho Crugen HT51
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—44
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth—12.5/32″
UTQG—720 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S

Kumho Crugen HT51

Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 80 vs 74 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 81 vs 76 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 75 vs 70 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Defender LTX M/S or Crugen HT51?

Which is better in the wet, Defender LTX M/S or Crugen HT51?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 81 vs 76 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Defender LTX M/S or Crugen HT51?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 78 vs 74 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Defender LTX M/S or Crugen HT51?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 74 vs 70 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Defender LTX M/S or Crugen HT51?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Defender LTX M/S or Crugen HT51?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology