Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-X — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 26 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

Parada Spec-X leads, 68–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Parada Spec-X
Tire BYokohama

Parada Spec-X

High Performance All-Season tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 28 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Parada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6565

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Parada Spec-X +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Parada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6772

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    Parada Spec-X +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Parada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6365

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67

    No road tests of snow for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Parada Spec-X +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Parada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6468

    Dueler H/T 684: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64.4 = 66

    Parada Spec-X: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 68 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 66

    Noise

    Parada Spec-X +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Parada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6573

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Dueler H/T 684 or Parada Spec-X. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    Level
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Parada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5758

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 56.8 = 61

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Parada Spec-X +8
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Parada Spec-X
    Reviews found online6270
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-X: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Dueler H/T 684Yokohama Parada Spec-X
Relative Score 66 68
Dry 66 66
Wet 68 72
Snow 66 67
Comfort 66 68
Noise 66 69
Treadwear 61 61
Handling (owners) 62 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dueler H/T 684

± 8

Parada Spec-X

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dueler H/T 684

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality on paved roads
  • Low noise levels during highway and city driving
  • Good dry-road grip and stable handling at normal speeds

Cons

  • Poor traction and slippery behavior in wet conditions
  • Rapid tread wear and disappointing overall durability
  • Inadequate off-road and mud performance
All owner themes in the Dueler H/T 684 review

Tire B Parada Spec-X

Pros

  • Significantly quieter and more comfortable than competing brands
  • Exceptional wet weather performance, handling heavy rain and standing water with confidence
  • Strong dry traction and responsive overall handling for aggressive driving

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear observed by some drivers, particularly on heavy SUVs
  • Shorter lifespan under harsh winter conditions or aggressive driving styles
All owner themes in the Parada Spec-X review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 B · Yokohama Parada Spec-X
CategorySummerHigh Performance All-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available223
Rim diameters16″ – 18″18″ – 24″
Tread depth9/32″11/32″
UTQG300 B B420 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684

Yokohama Parada Spec-X

Narrow edge: Yokohama Parada Spec-X — better handling, wet and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 70 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 72 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 69 vs 66 on noise.

Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684
Tire B · Yokohama Parada Spec-X

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dueler H/T 684 or Parada Spec-X?

Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/T 684 or Parada Spec-X?

Yokohama Parada Spec-X, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/T 684 or Parada Spec-X?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Dueler H/T 684 or Parada Spec-X?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Dueler H/T 684 or Parada Spec-X?

Yokohama Parada Spec-X, 69 vs 66 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/T 684 or Parada Spec-X?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Dueler H/T 684 or Parada Spec-X?

Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 61 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology