Tests – · none yet Owners – · 4 reviews (needs 5)
Bridgestone Duravis M700 HD looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Duravis M700 HD vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 4 + 1,073 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 3 tests Owners 85 · 1,073 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison79Why this score
Source Duravis M700 HD Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 74 Reviews found online – 87 Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 87 = 79
-
–
Wet
No comparison78Why this score
Source Duravis M700 HD Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 71 Reviews found online – 88 Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 87.9 = 78
-
–
Snow
No comparison78Why this score
Source Duravis M700 HD Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 76 Reviews found online – 82 Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 81.6 = 78
-
–
Comfort
No comparison71Why this score
Source Duravis M700 HD Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 55 Reviews found online – 81 Agilis CrossClimate: 40% × 54.7 + 60% × 81.1 = 71
-
–
Noise
No comparison75Why this score
Source Duravis M700 HD Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 82 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 75
No owner ratings of noise for Agilis CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison78Why this score
Source Duravis M700 HD Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online – 85 Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison81Why this score
Source Duravis M700 HD Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online – 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source Duravis M700 HD Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Duravis M700 HD | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 78 |
| Dry | – | 79 |
| Wet | – | 78 |
| Snow | – | 78 |
| Comfort | – | 71 |
| Noise | – | 75 |
| Treadwear | – | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Duravis M700 HD
Agilis CrossClimate
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Duravis M700 HD
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Agilis CrossClimate
Pros
- Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling
Cons
- Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
- Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
- A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Duravis M700 HD
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.
“Agilis Crossclimate vs Agilis LTX as a summer tire for a pickup? Daily driver Chevy 3/4 ton pickup. I've got a set of winter tires that I run from Nov-Mar but I need to replace my summer tires. Mediterranean climate, so dry summers. 99% of my driving is city/highway, maybe 1-5 days per year on dry dirt roads. I'd like to go with the crossclimate since they're about $200 cheaper for the set. I guess the Defender LTX just got rebranded Agilis LTX. I know the Defender LTX is a very popular light truck tire. Y'all think I can get away with the crossclimate and save a couple hundred bucks? Read more”
“I had a set on my Ford Transit 350 van. They were outstanding tires. IIRC I had them for maybe 20k miles. Wear seemed to be fine. But they were excellent in the wet and on snow and they were reasonably quiet. I never used them on anything more than wet grass and that van was terrible with traction on anything but the road, anyway, so I wouldn't evaluate a tire on grass or soft ground based on it.”
“Anyone tried Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tires on a Bolt? Following the info from I have picked up some used 15" Sonic wheels for winter use here in Maine. I can get Michelin Ice snow tires in an equivalent 15" size (to match the circumference of the stock tire/wheel) but not Cross Climate 2s. However, this Agilis is available in a near equivalent. It appears to be a heavier tire designed primarily for delivery vans Google AI suggests it has a slightly higher rolling resistance to the CC2s, which many report to have about a 10% hit on range - although any new tire will be less efficient than a well-worn one, so we should take that info with a grain of salt The Michelin Energy Saver tires are obviously more efficient, but also rated poor for use in snow. I'm a bit torn between "proper" snow tires and the Agilis, which I could run all year round One other factor is that smaller wheels tend to be more efficient - to a noticeable extent on EVs, so it just might be a wash as far as efficiency goes Read more”
Based on 54 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Duravis M700 HD | B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Van |
| Sizes available | 7 | 22 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 17″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 15/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 80 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Duravis M700 HD
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Only Michelin Agilis CrossClimate has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology