Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Ecopia EP001S is ahead, 65–35

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Ecopia EP001S +28
    37
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP001SGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online6321

    Ecopia EP001S: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 48.7 (est.) + 40% × 20.5 = 37

    No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP001S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Ecopia EP001S +38
    32
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP001SGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 41 (est.)
    Reviews found online7019

    Ecopia EP001S: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 41.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.9 = 32

    No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP001S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    48
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP001SGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online–33

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.5 = 48

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Ecopia EP001S +25
    41
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP001SGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6314

    Ecopia EP001S: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 66

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 14.1 = 41

    No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP001S or Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    52
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP001SGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–29

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 29 = 52

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Ecopia EP001S +15
    39
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP001SGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online4620

    Ecopia EP001S: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 20.1 = 39

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP001S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Ecopia EP001S +40
    23
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP001SGeolandar G91A
    Reviews found online6323
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia EP001SYokohama Geolandar G91A
Relative Score 65 35
Dry 65 37
Wet 70 32
Snow – 48
Comfort 66 41
Noise – 52
Treadwear 54 39
Handling (owners) 63 23

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecopia EP001S

Geolandar G91A

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecopia EP001S

Pros

  • Good grip in wet and dry conditions reported by some users
  • Better durability than certain previous tire brands noted by individual drivers
  • High performance in rolling resistance and fuel economy objectives

Cons

  • Significantly faster and sometimes uneven tread wear, with some reporting bald tires in very low mileage
  • Poor traction and sliding behavior noted in various weather conditions by disgruntled users
  • Hard, uncomfortable, and noisy ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
All owner themes in the Ecopia EP001S review

Tire B Geolandar G91A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A
CategorySummerAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—280 B A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S

Yokohama Geolandar G91A

Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar G91A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S scores 63 vs 23 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S scores 70 vs 32 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S scores 65 vs 37 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S scores 66 vs 41 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecopia EP001S or Geolandar G91A?

Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP001S or Geolandar G91A?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S, 70 vs 32 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP001S or Geolandar G91A?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S, 65 vs 37 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP001S or Geolandar G91A?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S, 66 vs 41 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP001S or Geolandar G91A?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S, 54 vs 39 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology