Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 vs Kumho Ecowing ES31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 9,931 owner reviews. How we score

Ecowing ES31 is ahead, 63–52

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecowing ES31
Tire BKumho

Ecowing ES31

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 9,931 reviews

“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 52

    Dry

    Ecowing ES31 +12
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP100Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online4462

    Ecopia EP100: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 52

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP100. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 55

    Wet

    Ecowing ES31 +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP100Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online4960

    Ecopia EP100: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 55

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63

    No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP100. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 52

    Comfort

    Ecowing ES31 +11
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP100Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4461

    Ecopia EP100: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 43.6 = 52

    Ecowing ES31: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.8 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP100. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 54

    Treadwear

    Ecowing ES31 +12
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP100Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4665

    Ecopia EP100: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 54

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP100. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 41

    Handling (owners)

    Ecowing ES31 +14
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP100Ecowing ES31
    Reviews found online4155
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 vs Kumho Ecowing ES31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia EP100Kumho Ecowing ES31
Relative Score 52 63
Dry 52 64
Wet 55 63
Comfort 52 63
Treadwear 54 66
Handling (owners) 41 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecopia EP100

± 8

Ecowing ES31

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecopia EP100

Pros

  • High fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
  • Impressive tread life and durability for daily driving
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality on motorways

Cons

  • Poor handling and stability during cornering
  • Excessive tire squeal at low speeds
  • Soft sidewalls causing a 'wallowing' or 'squirming' sensation
All owner themes in the Ecopia EP100 review

Tire B Ecowing ES31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium brand alternatives
  • Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort over bumps and speed humps
  • Improved fuel economy and reduced rolling resistance

Cons

  • Polarizing wet weather performance, with some users reporting frightening losses of traction
  • Soft sidewalls that can feel vague during quick lane changes or lead to vulnerability against curbs and potholes
  • Occasional reports of accelerated or uneven tread wear on outer shoulders
All owner themes in the Ecowing ES31 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Ecopia EP100

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 B · Kumho Ecowing ES31
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—39
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″
UTQG400 A A—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP100

Kumho Ecowing ES31

Winner: Kumho Ecowing ES31 — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 55 vs 41 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 64 vs 52 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 66 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 63 vs 52 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP100
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecopia EP100 or Ecowing ES31?

Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP100 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES31, 63 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP100 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES31, 64 vs 52 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP100 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES31, 63 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP100 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES31, 66 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology