Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 vs Kumho Ecowing ES31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 9,931 owner reviews. How we score
Ecowing ES31 is ahead, 63–52
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 9,931 reviews
“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
Ecowing ES31 +1264Why this score
Source Ecopia EP100 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 44 62 Ecopia EP100: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 52
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP100. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
55
Wet
Ecowing ES31 +863Why this score
Source Ecopia EP100 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 49 60 Ecopia EP100: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 55
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP100. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
52
Comfort
Ecowing ES31 +1163Why this score
Source Ecopia EP100 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 44 61 Ecopia EP100: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 43.6 = 52
Ecowing ES31: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.8 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP100. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
54
Treadwear
Ecowing ES31 +1266Why this score
Source Ecopia EP100 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 46 65 Ecopia EP100: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 54
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP100. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
41
Handling (owners)
Ecowing ES31 +1455Why this score
Source Ecopia EP100 Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 41 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 | Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 52 | 63 |
| Dry | 52 | 64 |
| Wet | 55 | 63 |
| Comfort | 52 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 41 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP100
Ecowing ES31
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP100
Pros
- High fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
- Impressive tread life and durability for daily driving
- Smooth and quiet ride quality on motorways
Cons
- Poor handling and stability during cornering
- Excessive tire squeal at low speeds
- Soft sidewalls causing a 'wallowing' or 'squirming' sensation
Tire B Ecowing ES31
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium brand alternatives
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort over bumps and speed humps
- Improved fuel economy and reduced rolling resistance
Cons
- Polarizing wet weather performance, with some users reporting frightening losses of traction
- Soft sidewalls that can feel vague during quick lane changes or lead to vulnerability against curbs and potholes
- Occasional reports of accelerated or uneven tread wear on outer shoulders
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Ecopia EP100
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Kumho Ecowing ES31
The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.
“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
“The EU label is all over the place. But none have A-A-A as far as I can tell. Did not score good in wet in the test on the site. Wear rate on a Mazda 2 should be decent with almost anything. Why not look at all seasons? Sava All weather and Kumho Solus are closest to the ES31 in price.”
“ES31s are fine, they're your usual budget tyre. Certainly not meant for any spirited driving or for sport type cars. I've had them before on the front my my Yaris and they were acceptable, got maybe 40,000km out of them.”
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 | B · Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 39 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
| UTQG | 400 A A | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP100
Kumho Ecowing ES31
Winner: Kumho Ecowing ES31 — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 55 vs 41 on handling.
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 64 vs 52 on dry.
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 66 vs 54 on treadwear.
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 63 vs 52 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP100 or Ecowing ES31?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP100 or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 63 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP100 or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 64 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP100 or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 63 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP100 or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 66 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology