Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 19 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP200 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP200 vs Yokohama Advan dB V552 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 37 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Ecopia EP200 61, Advan dB V552 60.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 37 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Ecopia EP200 +159Why this score
Source Ecopia EP200 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 55 54 Ecopia EP200: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 60
Advan dB V552: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 59
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
63
Wet
Level63Why this score
Source Ecopia EP200 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 61 60 Ecopia EP200: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63
Advan dB V552: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 63
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
64
Comfort
Advan dB V552 +165Why this score
Source Ecopia EP200 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 62 64 Ecopia EP200: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64
Advan dB V552: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.7 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
61
Treadwear
Ecopia EP200 +457Why this score
Source Ecopia EP200 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 58 52 Ecopia EP200: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
Advan dB V552: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
57
Handling (owners)
Level57Why this score
Source Ecopia EP200 Advan dB V552 Reviews found online 57 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP200 | Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 60 |
| Dry | 60 | 59 |
| Wet | 63 | 63 |
| Comfort | 64 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP200
Advan dB V552
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP200
Pros
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency and lower rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good long-term durability for conservative drivers
Cons
- Inconsistent grip levels, particularly in wet conditions
- Poor high-speed stability and 'floating' sensation at highway speeds
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users under moderate to heavy use
Tire B Advan dB V552
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and silent operation at various speeds
- High level of ride comfort, effectively absorbing bumps and potholes
- Good grip and sure-footed performance in wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can cause a floating sensation or lack of sharpness at higher speeds
- Reduced dry cornering grip when pushed hard, with some tendency to wash out
- Mixed feedback on overall durability, with a few users experiencing faster-than-expected wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP200 | B · Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 45 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP200
Yokohama Advan dB V552
Too close to call: Bridgestone Ecopia EP200 and Yokohama Advan dB V552 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Ecopia EP200 is stronger on treadwear. Bridgestone Ecopia EP200 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP200 scores 61 vs 57 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP200 or Advan dB V552?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP200 or Advan dB V552?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP200 or Advan dB V552?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 59 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP200 or Advan dB V552?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP200 or Advan dB V552?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP200, 61 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology