Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 17 reviews
Firestone TZ300 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Firestone TZ300 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 19 owner reviews. How we score
Ecopia EP300 is ahead, 70–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Ecopia EP300 +564Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 TZ300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 70 62 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69
TZ300: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 64
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for TZ300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
Ecopia EP300 +765Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 TZ300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 72 63 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
TZ300: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for TZ300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Comfort
Ecopia EP300 +563Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 TZ300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 61 Ecopia EP300: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 67 = 68
TZ300: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.5 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for TZ300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Treadwear
Ecopia EP300 +1159Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 TZ300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 73 55 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
TZ300: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for TZ300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Ecopia EP300 +1655Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 TZ300 Reviews found online 71 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | Firestone TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 63 |
| Dry | 69 | 64 |
| Wet | 72 | 65 |
| Comfort | 68 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 59 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP300
TZ300
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
Cons
- Wet weather grip can diminish significantly as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can result in a 'floaty' or bouncy driving feel
- Not intended for performance-oriented driving or aggressive cornering
Tire B TZ300
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong traction in both wet and dry conditions for standard road use
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear life reported across different vehicles
- Reports of increased road noise on certain road surfaces
- Unpredictable handling or light steering feel at higher speeds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | B · Firestone TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 29 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
Firestone TZ300
Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Firestone TZ300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 71 vs 55 on handling.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 70 vs 59 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 72 vs 65 on wet.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 64 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP300 or TZ300?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP300 or TZ300?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 72 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP300 or TZ300?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 69 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP300 or TZ300?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 68 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP300 or TZ300?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 70 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology